在序言之后截断:物联网网络上基于物理的饥饿攻击

Stefan Gvozdenovic, Johannes K. Becker, John Mikulskis, D. Starobinski
{"title":"在序言之后截断:物联网网络上基于物理的饥饿攻击","authors":"Stefan Gvozdenovic, Johannes K. Becker, John Mikulskis, D. Starobinski","doi":"10.1145/3395351.3399356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present and evaluate Truncate-after-Preamble (TaP) attacks, whereby a receiver cannot decode an incoming signal despite good channel conditions. In a TaP attack, the attacker announces a large payload length using a standard preamble and packet length field, but omits to transmit the payload. We implement the TaP attack on a SDR platform, and evaluate the effectiveness of the attack on five Zigbee and seven Wi-Fi devices sold by different manufacturers. We show that all of the Zigbee devices are vulnerable to the attack, while the Wi-Fi devices are vulnerable to the attack to varying degrees. Chiefly, we show that an attacker can cause over 90% packet loss on a Zigbee or Wi-Fi channel, using respectively six or five orders of magnitude less energy than a constant jammer would. Finally, we present several methods, with different degrees of sophistication, for detecting the attacks.","PeriodicalId":165929,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truncate after preamble: PHY-based starvation attacks on IoT networks\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Gvozdenovic, Johannes K. Becker, John Mikulskis, D. Starobinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3395351.3399356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present and evaluate Truncate-after-Preamble (TaP) attacks, whereby a receiver cannot decode an incoming signal despite good channel conditions. In a TaP attack, the attacker announces a large payload length using a standard preamble and packet length field, but omits to transmit the payload. We implement the TaP attack on a SDR platform, and evaluate the effectiveness of the attack on five Zigbee and seven Wi-Fi devices sold by different manufacturers. We show that all of the Zigbee devices are vulnerable to the attack, while the Wi-Fi devices are vulnerable to the attack to varying degrees. Chiefly, we show that an attacker can cause over 90% packet loss on a Zigbee or Wi-Fi channel, using respectively six or five orders of magnitude less energy than a constant jammer would. Finally, we present several methods, with different degrees of sophistication, for detecting the attacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3395351.3399356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3395351.3399356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们提出并评估了截断后(TaP)攻击,即接收器无法解码传入信号,尽管信道条件良好。在TaP攻击中,攻击者使用标准的序言和数据包长度字段宣布一个较大的有效载荷长度,但忽略了传输有效载荷。我们在SDR平台上实现了TaP攻击,并在不同厂商销售的5个Zigbee和7个Wi-Fi设备上评估了攻击的有效性。我们表明,所有的Zigbee设备都容易受到攻击,而Wi-Fi设备则不同程度地容易受到攻击。首先,我们展示了攻击者可以在Zigbee或Wi-Fi信道上造成90%以上的数据包丢失,使用的能量分别比恒定干扰器少六到五个数量级。最后,我们提出了几种不同复杂程度的检测攻击的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Truncate after preamble: PHY-based starvation attacks on IoT networks
We present and evaluate Truncate-after-Preamble (TaP) attacks, whereby a receiver cannot decode an incoming signal despite good channel conditions. In a TaP attack, the attacker announces a large payload length using a standard preamble and packet length field, but omits to transmit the payload. We implement the TaP attack on a SDR platform, and evaluate the effectiveness of the attack on five Zigbee and seven Wi-Fi devices sold by different manufacturers. We show that all of the Zigbee devices are vulnerable to the attack, while the Wi-Fi devices are vulnerable to the attack to varying degrees. Chiefly, we show that an attacker can cause over 90% packet loss on a Zigbee or Wi-Fi channel, using respectively six or five orders of magnitude less energy than a constant jammer would. Finally, we present several methods, with different degrees of sophistication, for detecting the attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信