中国-巴基斯坦经济走廊(CPEC)主干道(喀喇昆仑公路)滑坡调查与滑坡易感性制图

Hasnain Abbas, A. A. Khan, D. Hussain, G. Khan, Syed Najam ul Hassan, Isma Kulsoom, Sadiqa Hussain, S. Bazai
{"title":"中国-巴基斯坦经济走廊(CPEC)主干道(喀喇昆仑公路)滑坡调查与滑坡易感性制图","authors":"Hasnain Abbas, A. A. Khan, D. Hussain, G. Khan, Syed Najam ul Hassan, Isma Kulsoom, Sadiqa Hussain, S. Bazai","doi":"10.36785/2021111461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of landslide inventory is the first step towards landslide hazard management and planning. The proper inventory will also help to develop landslide susceptibility maps which will result to minimize economic and human losses. This work investigates landslide hazard mapping in the rugged mountain terrain vis-a-vis highly economically significant route between China and Pakistan i.e. Karakuram Highway (KKH). KKH is passing through the Karakorum mountainous region where landslides occur frequently and pose a serious threat to local travelers and tourists as well as to trading caravans. In this work, landslide inventory was developed (302 landslides) along KKH by visual interpretation of Sentinel and google images. Field survey was also carried to validate landslide datasets. The landslide dataset was divided into modelling/training (70%) and testing/validation (30%) datasets to develop and validate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM) using three models Frequency Ratio (FR), weight of evidence, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To develop LSMs, landslide controlling factors that include Slope, Aspect, Landcover, Geology, Proximity to Fault, Distance to Road and Stream, and Precipitation are correlated and considered using GIS techniques. LSMs generated using testing datasets are validated by Area Under Curve (AUC) criterion.  The results show that weight of evidence, FR and AHP have success rate curves of 61%, 84% and 72%, respectively. In addition, most highly accurate three models are validated for their prediction power using testing landslide datasets. The results for prediction capacity for weight of evidence, FR and AHP are 72%, 64%, and 58%, respectively. At the end, landslide susceptibility index (LSI) maps were classified into susceptibility zones. We also compared variation of weights in each class in AHP and FR model. The overall trend of increase or decrease in weights remains same except in few classes like precipitation class. The validation and prediction results show that FR model is the most reliable and accurate model which can be used for landslide management and planning. Our results will be helpful to minimize landslide hazard losses along KKH, ultimately assisting in successful implementation of CPEC idea between China and Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":199446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landslide Inventory and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)’s main route (Karakorum Highway)\",\"authors\":\"Hasnain Abbas, A. A. Khan, D. Hussain, G. Khan, Syed Najam ul Hassan, Isma Kulsoom, Sadiqa Hussain, S. Bazai\",\"doi\":\"10.36785/2021111461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of landslide inventory is the first step towards landslide hazard management and planning. The proper inventory will also help to develop landslide susceptibility maps which will result to minimize economic and human losses. This work investigates landslide hazard mapping in the rugged mountain terrain vis-a-vis highly economically significant route between China and Pakistan i.e. Karakuram Highway (KKH). KKH is passing through the Karakorum mountainous region where landslides occur frequently and pose a serious threat to local travelers and tourists as well as to trading caravans. In this work, landslide inventory was developed (302 landslides) along KKH by visual interpretation of Sentinel and google images. Field survey was also carried to validate landslide datasets. The landslide dataset was divided into modelling/training (70%) and testing/validation (30%) datasets to develop and validate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM) using three models Frequency Ratio (FR), weight of evidence, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To develop LSMs, landslide controlling factors that include Slope, Aspect, Landcover, Geology, Proximity to Fault, Distance to Road and Stream, and Precipitation are correlated and considered using GIS techniques. LSMs generated using testing datasets are validated by Area Under Curve (AUC) criterion.  The results show that weight of evidence, FR and AHP have success rate curves of 61%, 84% and 72%, respectively. In addition, most highly accurate three models are validated for their prediction power using testing landslide datasets. The results for prediction capacity for weight of evidence, FR and AHP are 72%, 64%, and 58%, respectively. At the end, landslide susceptibility index (LSI) maps were classified into susceptibility zones. We also compared variation of weights in each class in AHP and FR model. The overall trend of increase or decrease in weights remains same except in few classes like precipitation class. The validation and prediction results show that FR model is the most reliable and accurate model which can be used for landslide management and planning. Our results will be helpful to minimize landslide hazard losses along KKH, ultimately assisting in successful implementation of CPEC idea between China and Pakistan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36785/2021111461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36785/2021111461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

滑坡清单的编制是滑坡灾害管理与规划的第一步。适当的清单还将有助于编制滑坡易感性地图,从而最大限度地减少经济和人员损失。这项工作调查了中国和巴基斯坦之间具有高度经济意义的路线,即喀喇昆仑公路(KKH)的崎岖山区地形的滑坡灾害测绘。KKH公路途经喀喇昆仑山区,那里经常发生山体滑坡,对当地旅行者和游客以及贸易商队构成严重威胁。在这项工作中,通过Sentinel和谷歌图像的视觉解释,开发了KKH沿线的滑坡清单(302个滑坡)。对滑坡数据集进行了实地调查验证。滑坡数据集分为建模/训练(70%)和测试/验证(30%)数据集,使用频率比(FR)、证据权重和层次分析法(AHP)三种模型开发和验证滑坡敏感性图(LSM)。为了开发LSMs,滑坡控制因素包括坡度、坡向、地表覆盖、地质、靠近断层、到道路和溪流的距离以及降水,这些因素是相互关联的,并使用GIS技术进行考虑。使用测试数据集生成的lsm通过曲线下面积(AUC)标准进行验证。结果表明,证据权法、分级法和层次分析法的成功率曲线分别为61%、84%和72%。此外,利用测试滑坡数据集验证了最高精度的三种模型的预测能力。证据权预测能力为72%,FR预测能力为64%,AHP预测能力为58%。最后,利用滑坡易感性指数(LSI)图对滑坡易感性区进行了划分。我们还比较了AHP和FR模型中各类别权重的变化。除降水类等少数类别外,总体的增减趋势保持不变。验证和预测结果表明,FR模型是最可靠、最准确的滑坡管理和规划模型。我们的研究结果将有助于最大限度地减少喀喇昆仑公路沿线的滑坡灾害损失,最终协助中巴之间成功实施中巴经济走廊构想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landslide Inventory and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)’s main route (Karakorum Highway)
The development of landslide inventory is the first step towards landslide hazard management and planning. The proper inventory will also help to develop landslide susceptibility maps which will result to minimize economic and human losses. This work investigates landslide hazard mapping in the rugged mountain terrain vis-a-vis highly economically significant route between China and Pakistan i.e. Karakuram Highway (KKH). KKH is passing through the Karakorum mountainous region where landslides occur frequently and pose a serious threat to local travelers and tourists as well as to trading caravans. In this work, landslide inventory was developed (302 landslides) along KKH by visual interpretation of Sentinel and google images. Field survey was also carried to validate landslide datasets. The landslide dataset was divided into modelling/training (70%) and testing/validation (30%) datasets to develop and validate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM) using three models Frequency Ratio (FR), weight of evidence, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To develop LSMs, landslide controlling factors that include Slope, Aspect, Landcover, Geology, Proximity to Fault, Distance to Road and Stream, and Precipitation are correlated and considered using GIS techniques. LSMs generated using testing datasets are validated by Area Under Curve (AUC) criterion.  The results show that weight of evidence, FR and AHP have success rate curves of 61%, 84% and 72%, respectively. In addition, most highly accurate three models are validated for their prediction power using testing landslide datasets. The results for prediction capacity for weight of evidence, FR and AHP are 72%, 64%, and 58%, respectively. At the end, landslide susceptibility index (LSI) maps were classified into susceptibility zones. We also compared variation of weights in each class in AHP and FR model. The overall trend of increase or decrease in weights remains same except in few classes like precipitation class. The validation and prediction results show that FR model is the most reliable and accurate model which can be used for landslide management and planning. Our results will be helpful to minimize landslide hazard losses along KKH, ultimately assisting in successful implementation of CPEC idea between China and Pakistan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信