{"title":"“文明”是一种症状","authors":"Sergei Gurko","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the question of the appropriateness of using the term “civilization” in a historical work. It is shown that the internal inconsistency of this term makes it insufficiently neutral for history-as-science, but, probably, it can serve as a symptom of certain circumstances of history-as-process","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Civilization” as a symptom\",\"authors\":\"Sergei Gurko\",\"doi\":\"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the question of the appropriateness of using the term “civilization” in a historical work. It is shown that the internal inconsistency of this term makes it insufficiently neutral for history-as-science, but, probably, it can serve as a symptom of certain circumstances of history-as-process\",\"PeriodicalId\":328399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox. Philosophical journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox. Philosophical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox. Philosophical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article deals with the question of the appropriateness of using the term “civilization” in a historical work. It is shown that the internal inconsistency of this term makes it insufficiently neutral for history-as-science, but, probably, it can serve as a symptom of certain circumstances of history-as-process
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
