{"title":"重新思考3r:从洗白到权利","authors":"C. Blattner","doi":"10.1163/9789004391192_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few other issues have prompted as many legislators to adopt legal instruction on the \"proper\" use of non-human animals (hereinafter referred to as animals) in medical and scientific research. Today, the 3Rs ( replacement, reduction, and refinement of animals in scientific procedures) are globally accepted by a vast majority of states (Blattner, 2014); and prominent international organizations, such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (Terrestrial Animal Health Code, 2018, Article 7(8)(3)) and the Council of Europe (Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, 1986, Articles 6(2), 7 and 8). Widespread acceptance of the 3Rs is a notable achievement, since animal law is a relatively young field oflaw, and at titudes about the human-animal relationship diverge sharply across societies. As progressive as this established body of law appears, the rules govern ing research on animals-especially the 3R maxim that dominate this legal landscape-suffer from regulatory failure. First, and most importantly, de spite widespread commitment to replace and reduce animals in research, the number of animals used for experimental purposes worldwide is now the same as it was in the 1980s ( the number dropped in the 1990s and 2000s but has been rising ever since; Bayne et al., 2015, p. 3; European Commission, 2013; Taylor, 2013; Taylor et al., 2008; Taylor and Rego, 2016). Second, though the principle of refinement demands that the severity of experiments be dimin ished, countries are reporting a rising number of research procedures done on animals who are forced to endure the most severe experiments ( e.g., Neue Zurcher Zeitung, 2016). There is reason to believe that refinement, which seeks to ameliorate the conditions of animals used for a research procedure, fails to fulfill their basic welfare needs. For example, pursuant to the United States' Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, a pig who weighs up to 50kg can be housed for up to five years on 15 square feet ( o.gm2), without any","PeriodicalId":138056,"journal":{"name":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the 3Rs: From Whitewashing to Rights\",\"authors\":\"C. Blattner\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004391192_007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few other issues have prompted as many legislators to adopt legal instruction on the \\\"proper\\\" use of non-human animals (hereinafter referred to as animals) in medical and scientific research. Today, the 3Rs ( replacement, reduction, and refinement of animals in scientific procedures) are globally accepted by a vast majority of states (Blattner, 2014); and prominent international organizations, such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (Terrestrial Animal Health Code, 2018, Article 7(8)(3)) and the Council of Europe (Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, 1986, Articles 6(2), 7 and 8). Widespread acceptance of the 3Rs is a notable achievement, since animal law is a relatively young field oflaw, and at titudes about the human-animal relationship diverge sharply across societies. As progressive as this established body of law appears, the rules govern ing research on animals-especially the 3R maxim that dominate this legal landscape-suffer from regulatory failure. First, and most importantly, de spite widespread commitment to replace and reduce animals in research, the number of animals used for experimental purposes worldwide is now the same as it was in the 1980s ( the number dropped in the 1990s and 2000s but has been rising ever since; Bayne et al., 2015, p. 3; European Commission, 2013; Taylor, 2013; Taylor et al., 2008; Taylor and Rego, 2016). Second, though the principle of refinement demands that the severity of experiments be dimin ished, countries are reporting a rising number of research procedures done on animals who are forced to endure the most severe experiments ( e.g., Neue Zurcher Zeitung, 2016). There is reason to believe that refinement, which seeks to ameliorate the conditions of animals used for a research procedure, fails to fulfill their basic welfare needs. For example, pursuant to the United States' Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, a pig who weighs up to 50kg can be housed for up to five years on 15 square feet ( o.gm2), without any\",\"PeriodicalId\":138056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change\",\"volume\":\"247 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
很少有其他问题促使如此多的立法者通过关于在医学和科学研究中"适当"使用非人类动物(以下简称动物)的法律指示。如今,3r(在科学程序中替换、减少和改良动物)已被全球绝大多数国家所接受(Blattner, 2014);以及著名的国际组织,如世界动物卫生组织(陆生动物卫生法,2018年,第7(8)(3)条)和欧洲委员会(保护用于实验和其他科学目的的脊椎动物公约,1986年,第6(2)、7和8条)。3r的广泛接受是一项显著成就,因为动物法是一个相对年轻的领域。不同社会对人与动物关系的看法也大相径庭。尽管这一已确立的法律体系看起来是进步的,但管理动物研究的规则——尤其是主导这一法律领域的3R准则——却存在监管失灵的问题。首先,也是最重要的是,尽管人们普遍承诺在研究中取代和减少动物,但现在世界范围内用于实验目的的动物数量与20世纪80年代相同(20世纪90年代和21世纪初,这一数字有所下降,但此后一直在上升;Bayne et al., 2015, p. 3;欧盟委员会,2013;泰勒,2013;Taylor et al., 2008;Taylor and Rego, 2016)。其次,尽管细化原则要求降低实验的严重度,但各国正在报告越来越多的动物研究程序,这些动物被迫忍受最严厉的实验(例如,Neue Zurcher Zeitung, 2016)。有理由相信,旨在改善用于研究程序的动物条件的改良未能满足它们的基本福利需求。例如,根据美国《实验室动物护理和使用指南》,一头体重达50公斤的猪可以在15平方英尺(0.52平方英尺)的空间里饲养长达5年,而不需要任何食物
Few other issues have prompted as many legislators to adopt legal instruction on the "proper" use of non-human animals (hereinafter referred to as animals) in medical and scientific research. Today, the 3Rs ( replacement, reduction, and refinement of animals in scientific procedures) are globally accepted by a vast majority of states (Blattner, 2014); and prominent international organizations, such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (Terrestrial Animal Health Code, 2018, Article 7(8)(3)) and the Council of Europe (Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, 1986, Articles 6(2), 7 and 8). Widespread acceptance of the 3Rs is a notable achievement, since animal law is a relatively young field oflaw, and at titudes about the human-animal relationship diverge sharply across societies. As progressive as this established body of law appears, the rules govern ing research on animals-especially the 3R maxim that dominate this legal landscape-suffer from regulatory failure. First, and most importantly, de spite widespread commitment to replace and reduce animals in research, the number of animals used for experimental purposes worldwide is now the same as it was in the 1980s ( the number dropped in the 1990s and 2000s but has been rising ever since; Bayne et al., 2015, p. 3; European Commission, 2013; Taylor, 2013; Taylor et al., 2008; Taylor and Rego, 2016). Second, though the principle of refinement demands that the severity of experiments be dimin ished, countries are reporting a rising number of research procedures done on animals who are forced to endure the most severe experiments ( e.g., Neue Zurcher Zeitung, 2016). There is reason to believe that refinement, which seeks to ameliorate the conditions of animals used for a research procedure, fails to fulfill their basic welfare needs. For example, pursuant to the United States' Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, a pig who weighs up to 50kg can be housed for up to five years on 15 square feet ( o.gm2), without any