新型冠状病毒肺炎右心血栓合并高危肺栓塞的POCUS诊断

B. Gupta, L. Orr, N. Cobb
{"title":"新型冠状病毒肺炎右心血栓合并高危肺栓塞的POCUS诊断","authors":"B. Gupta, L. Orr, N. Cobb","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case Presentation: A 74-year-old female nursing home patient with a history of ischemic stroke, hypertension, and obesity presented with fever, dyspnea, and hypoxemia to the emergency department. A chest radiograph demonstrated diffuse bilateral infiltrates and a rapid COVID-19 PCR was positive. She was emergently intubated and developed hemodynamic instability requiring multiple vasopressors, and her extremities were noted to be cool and clammy. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large irregularly shaped mobile hyperechoic density transiting the tricuspid valve as well as a dilated right ventricle. She was started on unfractionated heparin for concern of acute pulmonary embolism, though she did not undergo diagnostic imaging due to her hemodynamic instability and COVID-19 status. Bedside findings were formally confirmed by an emergent formal transthoracic echocardiogram and intravenous alteplase was administered. Her hemodynamics stabilized shortly after and she was weaned from vasopressor support. A repeat POCUS the following day showed resolution of the thrombus. Discussion: COVID-19 has altered the risk-benefit calculus of many clinical activities, impacting the availability of imaging due infection control, transport, and staffing issues. POCUS can serve as an efficient diagnostic modality in times of limited resources and/or emergent situations requiring rapid bedside diagnosis. Management of a moderate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with anticoagulation is a widely accepted practice, and thrombolytics should be considered when hemodynamic instability is present. However, the management is less clear when a right heart thrombus (RHT) is found. The incidence of RHT ranges from 4-18%, though its identification is expected to increase with the rising popularity and training of POCUS. A RHT is considered a medical emergency given the high propensity of progression to a PE and increased mortality rate. Treatment with thrombolytics in addition to anticoagulation has shown improved outcomes in retrospective studies and meta-analyses, and is favored when compared to anticoagulation alone or surgical interventions, however there are still no definitive guidelines regarding its routine use. With new treatment modalities such as catheter-directed thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy becoming more widely available, larger studies are needed to show which treatment choice is superior. Regardless, prompt diagnosis can be achieved with POCUS and therapy can be initiated sooner which is proven to improve outcomes and was demonstrated in the case above.","PeriodicalId":244282,"journal":{"name":"TP80. TP080 YELLOW SUBMARINE - PULMONARY EMBOLI AND OTHER CASE REPORTS","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right Heart Thrombus with High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Pneumonia, a POCUS Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"B. Gupta, L. Orr, N. Cobb\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case Presentation: A 74-year-old female nursing home patient with a history of ischemic stroke, hypertension, and obesity presented with fever, dyspnea, and hypoxemia to the emergency department. A chest radiograph demonstrated diffuse bilateral infiltrates and a rapid COVID-19 PCR was positive. She was emergently intubated and developed hemodynamic instability requiring multiple vasopressors, and her extremities were noted to be cool and clammy. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large irregularly shaped mobile hyperechoic density transiting the tricuspid valve as well as a dilated right ventricle. She was started on unfractionated heparin for concern of acute pulmonary embolism, though she did not undergo diagnostic imaging due to her hemodynamic instability and COVID-19 status. Bedside findings were formally confirmed by an emergent formal transthoracic echocardiogram and intravenous alteplase was administered. Her hemodynamics stabilized shortly after and she was weaned from vasopressor support. A repeat POCUS the following day showed resolution of the thrombus. Discussion: COVID-19 has altered the risk-benefit calculus of many clinical activities, impacting the availability of imaging due infection control, transport, and staffing issues. POCUS can serve as an efficient diagnostic modality in times of limited resources and/or emergent situations requiring rapid bedside diagnosis. Management of a moderate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with anticoagulation is a widely accepted practice, and thrombolytics should be considered when hemodynamic instability is present. However, the management is less clear when a right heart thrombus (RHT) is found. The incidence of RHT ranges from 4-18%, though its identification is expected to increase with the rising popularity and training of POCUS. A RHT is considered a medical emergency given the high propensity of progression to a PE and increased mortality rate. Treatment with thrombolytics in addition to anticoagulation has shown improved outcomes in retrospective studies and meta-analyses, and is favored when compared to anticoagulation alone or surgical interventions, however there are still no definitive guidelines regarding its routine use. With new treatment modalities such as catheter-directed thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy becoming more widely available, larger studies are needed to show which treatment choice is superior. Regardless, prompt diagnosis can be achieved with POCUS and therapy can be initiated sooner which is proven to improve outcomes and was demonstrated in the case above.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP80. TP080 YELLOW SUBMARINE - PULMONARY EMBOLI AND OTHER CASE REPORTS\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP80. TP080 YELLOW SUBMARINE - PULMONARY EMBOLI AND OTHER CASE REPORTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP80. TP080 YELLOW SUBMARINE - PULMONARY EMBOLI AND OTHER CASE REPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病例介绍:一名74岁养老院女性患者,有缺血性脑卒中、高血压和肥胖病史,以发热、呼吸困难和低氧血症就诊于急诊科。胸片显示双侧弥漫性浸润,快速COVID-19 PCR阳性。她被紧急插管,并出现血流动力学不稳定,需要多种血管加压药物,她的四肢被注意到凉爽和潮湿。即时超声(POCUS)显示一个大的不规则形状的移动高回声密度穿过三尖瓣和扩张的右心室。由于担心急性肺栓塞,她开始使用不分离肝素,但由于她的血流动力学不稳定和COVID-19状态,她没有接受诊断性影像学检查。床边检查结果经急诊正式经胸超声心动图证实,并静脉注射阿替普酶。她的血流动力学稳定后不久,她脱离血管加压剂支持。第二天复查POCUS显示血栓溶解。讨论:COVID-19改变了许多临床活动的风险-收益计算,由于感染控制、运输和人员配备问题,影响了成像的可用性。在资源有限和/或需要快速床边诊断的紧急情况下,POCUS可以作为一种有效的诊断方式。中高风险肺栓塞(PE)的抗凝治疗是一种被广泛接受的做法,当血流动力学不稳定时应考虑溶栓治疗。然而,当发现右心血栓(RHT)时,处理不太清楚。RHT的发生率为4-18%,但随着POCUS的日益普及和培训,RHT的识别预计会增加。RHT被认为是一种医疗紧急情况,因为它有很高的发展为PE的倾向和死亡率增加。在回顾性研究和荟萃分析中,除抗凝治疗外,溶栓治疗已显示出改善的结果,与单独抗凝或手术干预相比,溶栓治疗更受青睐,但对于其常规使用仍没有明确的指南。随着新的治疗方式,如导管导向溶栓和手术栓塞切除术变得越来越广泛,需要更大规模的研究来显示哪种治疗选择是优越的。无论如何,POCUS可以获得及时诊断,并且可以更快地开始治疗,这已被证明可以改善预后,上述病例也证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right Heart Thrombus with High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Pneumonia, a POCUS Diagnosis
Case Presentation: A 74-year-old female nursing home patient with a history of ischemic stroke, hypertension, and obesity presented with fever, dyspnea, and hypoxemia to the emergency department. A chest radiograph demonstrated diffuse bilateral infiltrates and a rapid COVID-19 PCR was positive. She was emergently intubated and developed hemodynamic instability requiring multiple vasopressors, and her extremities were noted to be cool and clammy. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large irregularly shaped mobile hyperechoic density transiting the tricuspid valve as well as a dilated right ventricle. She was started on unfractionated heparin for concern of acute pulmonary embolism, though she did not undergo diagnostic imaging due to her hemodynamic instability and COVID-19 status. Bedside findings were formally confirmed by an emergent formal transthoracic echocardiogram and intravenous alteplase was administered. Her hemodynamics stabilized shortly after and she was weaned from vasopressor support. A repeat POCUS the following day showed resolution of the thrombus. Discussion: COVID-19 has altered the risk-benefit calculus of many clinical activities, impacting the availability of imaging due infection control, transport, and staffing issues. POCUS can serve as an efficient diagnostic modality in times of limited resources and/or emergent situations requiring rapid bedside diagnosis. Management of a moderate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with anticoagulation is a widely accepted practice, and thrombolytics should be considered when hemodynamic instability is present. However, the management is less clear when a right heart thrombus (RHT) is found. The incidence of RHT ranges from 4-18%, though its identification is expected to increase with the rising popularity and training of POCUS. A RHT is considered a medical emergency given the high propensity of progression to a PE and increased mortality rate. Treatment with thrombolytics in addition to anticoagulation has shown improved outcomes in retrospective studies and meta-analyses, and is favored when compared to anticoagulation alone or surgical interventions, however there are still no definitive guidelines regarding its routine use. With new treatment modalities such as catheter-directed thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy becoming more widely available, larger studies are needed to show which treatment choice is superior. Regardless, prompt diagnosis can be achieved with POCUS and therapy can be initiated sooner which is proven to improve outcomes and was demonstrated in the case above.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信