直流和射频溅射制备TiO2薄膜的比较。

R. Cesar, A. Pascon, J. A. Diniz, E. Joanni, M. Mederos, R. Texeira
{"title":"直流和射频溅射制备TiO2薄膜的比较。","authors":"R. Cesar, A. Pascon, J. A. Diniz, E. Joanni, M. Mederos, R. Texeira","doi":"10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares titanium oxide (TiO2) thin films deposited by RF and DC sputtering. Structural characterization was used to investigate the morphology of TiO2 thin films. Both films show the rutile and anatase crystal structure; ellipsometry show thickness and refractive index of 50 nm and 2.43 for the TiO2 deposited by DC sputtering and 40 nm and 2.32 for the film by RF sputtering; AFM shows the roots mean square (RMS) roughness of 6.5 nm and 8 nm for TiO2 deposited by DC and RF sputtering, respectively. For electrical characterization was developed MOS capacitor; from them was possible to determine which method forms the best dielectric film, defined by high dielectric constant value (high-k), lower charge density (Q0/q) and flat-band voltage (VFB) around -0.9V. Therefore, the best method to deposit TiO2 is DC reactive sputtering; because this method showed a better electrical conditions and a well-defined crystalline structure","PeriodicalId":403446,"journal":{"name":"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparasion between TiO2 thin films deposited by DC and RF sputtering.\",\"authors\":\"R. Cesar, A. Pascon, J. A. Diniz, E. Joanni, M. Mederos, R. Texeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares titanium oxide (TiO2) thin films deposited by RF and DC sputtering. Structural characterization was used to investigate the morphology of TiO2 thin films. Both films show the rutile and anatase crystal structure; ellipsometry show thickness and refractive index of 50 nm and 2.43 for the TiO2 deposited by DC sputtering and 40 nm and 2.32 for the film by RF sputtering; AFM shows the roots mean square (RMS) roughness of 6.5 nm and 8 nm for TiO2 deposited by DC and RF sputtering, respectively. For electrical characterization was developed MOS capacitor; from them was possible to determine which method forms the best dielectric film, defined by high dielectric constant value (high-k), lower charge density (Q0/q) and flat-band voltage (VFB) around -0.9V. Therefore, the best method to deposit TiO2 is DC reactive sputtering; because this method showed a better electrical conditions and a well-defined crystalline structure\",\"PeriodicalId\":403446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了射频溅射和直流溅射制备氧化钛(TiO2)薄膜的性能。采用结构表征方法研究了TiO2薄膜的形貌。两种薄膜均呈现金红石和锐钛矿的晶体结构;椭偏仪显示,直流溅射法制备的TiO2薄膜厚度为50 nm,折射率为2.43;射频溅射法制备的TiO2薄膜厚度为40 nm,折射率为2.32;AFM结果表明,直流溅射和射频溅射制备的TiO2的RMS粗糙度分别为6.5 nm和8 nm。为进行电学表征,研制了MOS电容器;从中可以确定哪种方法形成最好的介电膜,其定义为高介电常数值(high-k),低电荷密度(Q0/q)和-0.9V左右的平带电压(VFB)。因此,沉积TiO2的最佳方法是直流反应溅射;因为这种方法具有较好的电学条件和良好的晶体结构
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparasion between TiO2 thin films deposited by DC and RF sputtering.
This paper compares titanium oxide (TiO2) thin films deposited by RF and DC sputtering. Structural characterization was used to investigate the morphology of TiO2 thin films. Both films show the rutile and anatase crystal structure; ellipsometry show thickness and refractive index of 50 nm and 2.43 for the TiO2 deposited by DC sputtering and 40 nm and 2.32 for the film by RF sputtering; AFM shows the roots mean square (RMS) roughness of 6.5 nm and 8 nm for TiO2 deposited by DC and RF sputtering, respectively. For electrical characterization was developed MOS capacitor; from them was possible to determine which method forms the best dielectric film, defined by high dielectric constant value (high-k), lower charge density (Q0/q) and flat-band voltage (VFB) around -0.9V. Therefore, the best method to deposit TiO2 is DC reactive sputtering; because this method showed a better electrical conditions and a well-defined crystalline structure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信