{"title":"非线性MEMS梁的降阶建模技术比较研究","authors":"J. Juillard","doi":"10.1109/DTIP.2014.7056674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is dedicated to the comparison of three techniques of reduced-order modeling (ROM) that may be applied to MEMS beams subject to nonlinear damping and restoring forces. These methods are compared in terms of simplicity and accuracy, in the static, transient and steady-state regimes. It is shown that one of the most popular ROM methods may lead to dramatically wrong results in the case of single-mode decomposition.","PeriodicalId":268119,"journal":{"name":"2014 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of reduced-order modeling techniques for nonlinear MEMS beams\",\"authors\":\"J. Juillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DTIP.2014.7056674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is dedicated to the comparison of three techniques of reduced-order modeling (ROM) that may be applied to MEMS beams subject to nonlinear damping and restoring forces. These methods are compared in terms of simplicity and accuracy, in the static, transient and steady-state regimes. It is shown that one of the most popular ROM methods may lead to dramatically wrong results in the case of single-mode decomposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTIP.2014.7056674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTIP.2014.7056674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of reduced-order modeling techniques for nonlinear MEMS beams
This paper is dedicated to the comparison of three techniques of reduced-order modeling (ROM) that may be applied to MEMS beams subject to nonlinear damping and restoring forces. These methods are compared in terms of simplicity and accuracy, in the static, transient and steady-state regimes. It is shown that one of the most popular ROM methods may lead to dramatically wrong results in the case of single-mode decomposition.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
