{"title":"圣礼教会的社会利益:德·鲁巴克、解放神学与进步","authors":"J. Wood","doi":"10.26443/jcreor.v2i2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joseph Flipper has recently charged Henri de Lubac with a failure to extend notions of sacramental significance beyond the liturgical fellowship of the Church. This apparent restriction is displayed most prominently in de Lubac’s reservations about liberation theology and programs of “progress.” This article examines de Lubac’s criticisms of – and convergences with – liberation theology, with a focus on the work of Gustavo Gutiérrez, who admits the influence of de Lubac on his own thought and offers a somewhat different version of a sacramental ecclesiology. I show that considering the socio-political and post-conciliar context of de Lubac’s work can inform a proper understanding such differences and convergences. While de Lubac certainly maintains an ecclesial center in his political theology, he is clearly concerned about the pursuit of the social good beyond the Church. I conclude that the inconsistency perceived by Flipper is mitigated by these considerations, and by reading de Lubac’s later comments on progress and liberation in the light of his earlier efforts in resisting anti-Semitism and racist nationalism.","PeriodicalId":178128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Social Good of a Sacramental Ecclesiology: De Lubac, Liberation Theology, and Progress\",\"authors\":\"J. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.26443/jcreor.v2i2.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Joseph Flipper has recently charged Henri de Lubac with a failure to extend notions of sacramental significance beyond the liturgical fellowship of the Church. This apparent restriction is displayed most prominently in de Lubac’s reservations about liberation theology and programs of “progress.” This article examines de Lubac’s criticisms of – and convergences with – liberation theology, with a focus on the work of Gustavo Gutiérrez, who admits the influence of de Lubac on his own thought and offers a somewhat different version of a sacramental ecclesiology. I show that considering the socio-political and post-conciliar context of de Lubac’s work can inform a proper understanding such differences and convergences. While de Lubac certainly maintains an ecclesial center in his political theology, he is clearly concerned about the pursuit of the social good beyond the Church. I conclude that the inconsistency perceived by Flipper is mitigated by these considerations, and by reading de Lubac’s later comments on progress and liberation in the light of his earlier efforts in resisting anti-Semitism and racist nationalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v2i2.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v2i2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Joseph Flipper最近指控Henri de Lubac未能将圣礼意义的概念扩展到教会礼仪团契之外。这种明显的限制在德·鲁巴克对解放神学和“进步”计划的保留意见中表现得最为突出。本文考察了德·鲁巴克对解放神学的批评——以及与解放神学的汇合,重点是古斯塔沃·古蒂海姆瑞兹的著作,他承认德·鲁巴克对自己思想的影响,并提供了一种不同版本的圣礼教会论。我认为,考虑到德卢卡克作品的社会政治和后会议背景,可以为正确理解这些差异和趋同提供信息。虽然德·鲁巴克在他的政治神学中肯定保持着一个教会中心,但他显然关心的是对教会之外的社会利益的追求。我的结论是,通过这些考虑,通过阅读德·卢卡克后来对进步和解放的评论,以及他早期抵制反犹太主义和种族主义民族主义的努力,Flipper所感知到的不一致被减轻了。
The Social Good of a Sacramental Ecclesiology: De Lubac, Liberation Theology, and Progress
Joseph Flipper has recently charged Henri de Lubac with a failure to extend notions of sacramental significance beyond the liturgical fellowship of the Church. This apparent restriction is displayed most prominently in de Lubac’s reservations about liberation theology and programs of “progress.” This article examines de Lubac’s criticisms of – and convergences with – liberation theology, with a focus on the work of Gustavo Gutiérrez, who admits the influence of de Lubac on his own thought and offers a somewhat different version of a sacramental ecclesiology. I show that considering the socio-political and post-conciliar context of de Lubac’s work can inform a proper understanding such differences and convergences. While de Lubac certainly maintains an ecclesial center in his political theology, he is clearly concerned about the pursuit of the social good beyond the Church. I conclude that the inconsistency perceived by Flipper is mitigated by these considerations, and by reading de Lubac’s later comments on progress and liberation in the light of his earlier efforts in resisting anti-Semitism and racist nationalism.