专利禁止反悔中的希望、期望和可撤销承诺

Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2009-10-21 DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x

Nick Piška

{"title":"专利禁止反悔中的希望、期望和可撤销承诺","authors":"Nick Piška","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note dicusses the House of Lords' decisions in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd (Cobbe) and Thorner v Major (Thorner) regarding the nature and scope of proprietary estoppel. It considers the historical development of the modern law of proprietary estoppel, the circumstances in which equity will render a promise irrevocable, and the role of context in the ascription of responsibility.","PeriodicalId":426546,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hopes, Expectations and Revocable Promises in Proprietary Estoppel\",\"authors\":\"Nick Piška\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note dicusses the House of Lords' decisions in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd (Cobbe) and Thorner v Major (Thorner) regarding the nature and scope of proprietary estoppel. It considers the historical development of the modern law of proprietary estoppel, the circumstances in which equity will render a promise irrevocable, and the role of context in the ascription of responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"volume\":\"190 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论上议院在Cobbe诉Yeoman's Row Management Ltd (Cobbe)和Thorner诉Major (Thorner)案中关于专有禁止反言的性质和范围的决定。它考虑了现代所有权禁止反悔法的历史发展，衡平法将使承诺不可撤销的情况，以及背景在责任归属中的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hopes, Expectations and Revocable Promises in Proprietary Estoppel

This note dicusses the House of Lords' decisions in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd (Cobbe) and Thorner v Major (Thorner) regarding the nature and scope of proprietary estoppel. It considers the historical development of the modern law of proprietary estoppel, the circumstances in which equity will render a promise irrevocable, and the role of context in the ascription of responsibility.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量