群体水平认知诊断:多任务学习视角

Jie Huang, Qi Liu, Fei Wang, Zhenya Huang, Songtao Fang, Runze Wu, Enhong Chen, Yu Su, Shijin Wang
{"title":"群体水平认知诊断:多任务学习视角","authors":"Jie Huang, Qi Liu, Fei Wang, Zhenya Huang, Songtao Fang, Runze Wu, Enhong Chen, Yu Su, Shijin Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most cognitive diagnosis research in education has been concentrated on individual assessment, aiming at discovering the latent characteristics of students. However, in many real-world scenarios, group-level assessment is an important and meaningful task, e.g., class assessment in different regions can discover the difference of teaching level in different contexts. In this work, we consider assessing cognitive ability for a group of students, which aims to mine groups’ proficiency on specific knowledge concepts. The significant challenge in this task is the sparsity of group-exercise response data, which seriously affects the assessment performance. Existing works either do not make effective use of additional student-exercise response data or fail to reasonably model the relationship between group ability and individual ability in different learning contexts, resulting in sub-optimal diagnosis results. To this end, we propose a general Multi-Task based Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis (MGCD) framework, which is featured with three special designs: 1) We jointly model student-exercise responses and group-exercise responses in a multi-task manner to alleviate the sparsity of group-exercise responses; 2) We design a context-aware attention network to model the relationship between student knowledge state and group knowledge state in different contexts; 3) We model an interpretable cognitive layer to obtain student ability, group ability and exercise factors (e.g., difficulty), and then we leverage neural networks to learn complex interaction functions among them. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the generality of MGCD and the effectiveness of our attention design and multi-task learning.","PeriodicalId":320970,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-Task Learning Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jie Huang, Qi Liu, Fei Wang, Zhenya Huang, Songtao Fang, Runze Wu, Enhong Chen, Yu Su, Shijin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most cognitive diagnosis research in education has been concentrated on individual assessment, aiming at discovering the latent characteristics of students. However, in many real-world scenarios, group-level assessment is an important and meaningful task, e.g., class assessment in different regions can discover the difference of teaching level in different contexts. In this work, we consider assessing cognitive ability for a group of students, which aims to mine groups’ proficiency on specific knowledge concepts. The significant challenge in this task is the sparsity of group-exercise response data, which seriously affects the assessment performance. Existing works either do not make effective use of additional student-exercise response data or fail to reasonably model the relationship between group ability and individual ability in different learning contexts, resulting in sub-optimal diagnosis results. To this end, we propose a general Multi-Task based Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis (MGCD) framework, which is featured with three special designs: 1) We jointly model student-exercise responses and group-exercise responses in a multi-task manner to alleviate the sparsity of group-exercise responses; 2) We design a context-aware attention network to model the relationship between student knowledge state and group knowledge state in different contexts; 3) We model an interpretable cognitive layer to obtain student ability, group ability and exercise factors (e.g., difficulty), and then we leverage neural networks to learn complex interaction functions among them. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the generality of MGCD and the effectiveness of our attention design and multi-task learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

教育领域的认知诊断研究大多集中在个体评估上,旨在发现学生的潜在特征。然而,在许多现实场景中,小组层面的评估是一项重要而有意义的任务,例如,不同地区的班级评估可以发现不同情境下教学水平的差异。在这项工作中,我们考虑对一组学生进行认知能力评估,旨在挖掘小组对特定知识概念的熟练程度。该任务面临的重大挑战是小组练习响应数据的稀疏性,这严重影响了评估绩效。现有的工作要么没有有效地利用额外的学生运动反应数据,要么没有合理地模拟不同学习情境下群体能力和个人能力之间的关系,导致诊断结果不理想。为此,我们提出了一个通用的基于多任务的群体层次认知诊断(MGCD)框架,该框架有三个特殊的设计:1)我们以多任务的方式联合建模学生练习反应和群体练习反应,以减轻群体练习反应的稀疏性;2)设计了一个情境感知的注意网络,对不同情境下学生知识状态与群体知识状态的关系进行建模;3)建立一个可解释的认知层模型,获取学生能力、群体能力和练习因素(如难度),然后利用神经网络学习它们之间复杂的交互函数。在现实世界数据集上的大量实验证明了MGCD的普遍性以及我们的注意力设计和多任务学习的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-Task Learning Perspective
Most cognitive diagnosis research in education has been concentrated on individual assessment, aiming at discovering the latent characteristics of students. However, in many real-world scenarios, group-level assessment is an important and meaningful task, e.g., class assessment in different regions can discover the difference of teaching level in different contexts. In this work, we consider assessing cognitive ability for a group of students, which aims to mine groups’ proficiency on specific knowledge concepts. The significant challenge in this task is the sparsity of group-exercise response data, which seriously affects the assessment performance. Existing works either do not make effective use of additional student-exercise response data or fail to reasonably model the relationship between group ability and individual ability in different learning contexts, resulting in sub-optimal diagnosis results. To this end, we propose a general Multi-Task based Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis (MGCD) framework, which is featured with three special designs: 1) We jointly model student-exercise responses and group-exercise responses in a multi-task manner to alleviate the sparsity of group-exercise responses; 2) We design a context-aware attention network to model the relationship between student knowledge state and group knowledge state in different contexts; 3) We model an interpretable cognitive layer to obtain student ability, group ability and exercise factors (e.g., difficulty), and then we leverage neural networks to learn complex interaction functions among them. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the generality of MGCD and the effectiveness of our attention design and multi-task learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信