立法信息游说

Arnaud Dellis
{"title":"立法信息游说","authors":"Arnaud Dellis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3686620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whom should an interest group lobby in a legislature? I develop a model of informational lobbying in which a legislature must decide on the allocation of district-specific goods and projects. An interest group chooses to search and provide information on districts' valuations of the goods. The setting is one of distributive politics with an allocation of goods and projects that is endogeneous to the information provided by the interest group. I characterize the information search strategy of the interest group. I determine who gains and who loses from lobbying, identifying circumstances in which legislators would unanimously prefer to ban informational lobbying. I also identify two empirical and institutional implications. First, I establish a relationship between informational lobbying and legislative majority requirement. Second, I provide an informational rationale for friendly lobbying (that is, the interest group lobbying legislative allies).","PeriodicalId":119201,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislative Informational Lobbying\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Dellis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3686620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whom should an interest group lobby in a legislature? I develop a model of informational lobbying in which a legislature must decide on the allocation of district-specific goods and projects. An interest group chooses to search and provide information on districts' valuations of the goods. The setting is one of distributive politics with an allocation of goods and projects that is endogeneous to the information provided by the interest group. I characterize the information search strategy of the interest group. I determine who gains and who loses from lobbying, identifying circumstances in which legislators would unanimously prefer to ban informational lobbying. I also identify two empirical and institutional implications. First, I establish a relationship between informational lobbying and legislative majority requirement. Second, I provide an informational rationale for friendly lobbying (that is, the interest group lobbying legislative allies).\",\"PeriodicalId\":119201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

利益集团应该在立法机关游说谁?我开发了一个信息游说的模型,在这个模型中,立法机关必须决定对特定地区的商品和项目的分配。利益集团选择搜索并提供有关地区对商品估值的信息。这是一种分配政治,商品和项目的分配与利益集团提供的信息是内生的。我描述了利益集团的信息搜索策略。我决定谁从游说中获利,谁从游说中损失,确定立法者一致倾向于禁止信息游说的情况。我还指出了两个实证和制度意义。首先,建立了信息游说与立法多数要求之间的关系。其次,我为友好游说(即利益集团游说立法盟友)提供了信息基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legislative Informational Lobbying
Whom should an interest group lobby in a legislature? I develop a model of informational lobbying in which a legislature must decide on the allocation of district-specific goods and projects. An interest group chooses to search and provide information on districts' valuations of the goods. The setting is one of distributive politics with an allocation of goods and projects that is endogeneous to the information provided by the interest group. I characterize the information search strategy of the interest group. I determine who gains and who loses from lobbying, identifying circumstances in which legislators would unanimously prefer to ban informational lobbying. I also identify two empirical and institutional implications. First, I establish a relationship between informational lobbying and legislative majority requirement. Second, I provide an informational rationale for friendly lobbying (that is, the interest group lobbying legislative allies).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信