{"title":"对安大略省法院对Nareerux案判决的关注","authors":"J. Dolan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1956700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, which was published in 128 Banking Law Journal 116 (2011), Professor Dolan contends that the Ontario Court of Appeal created havoc with letter of credit law in Ontario by imposing on letter of credit issuers serious burdens requiring the policing of the underlying commercial transaction between the applicant for the credit and the beneficiary, all in a fashion contrary to Canadian precedent and contrary to a healthy legal environment for letters of credit.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns Regarding the Ontario Court's Judgment in the Nareerux Case\",\"authors\":\"J. Dolan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1956700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, which was published in 128 Banking Law Journal 116 (2011), Professor Dolan contends that the Ontario Court of Appeal created havoc with letter of credit law in Ontario by imposing on letter of credit issuers serious burdens requiring the policing of the underlying commercial transaction between the applicant for the credit and the beneficiary, all in a fashion contrary to Canadian precedent and contrary to a healthy legal environment for letters of credit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concerns Regarding the Ontario Court's Judgment in the Nareerux Case
In this article, which was published in 128 Banking Law Journal 116 (2011), Professor Dolan contends that the Ontario Court of Appeal created havoc with letter of credit law in Ontario by imposing on letter of credit issuers serious burdens requiring the policing of the underlying commercial transaction between the applicant for the credit and the beneficiary, all in a fashion contrary to Canadian precedent and contrary to a healthy legal environment for letters of credit.