雇佣纠纷中的集体诉讼

P. Spiro
{"title":"雇佣纠纷中的集体诉讼","authors":"P. Spiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2523754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional means by which workers asserted their collective rights was the union movement, but that has been in severe decline in the private sector. Class action lawsuits would appear to be the ideal modern substitute. There have been a few noteworthy successes for employees in the last few years, helping to ensure that employers in the banking sector abide by statutory requirements to provide overtime pay. Certification has proven to be a significant hurdle in these actions, and there appear to be some meritorious cases where certification was not achieved. It is arguable that the case law that has developed around the finding of a common issue for certification is too confining for the employment context. The application of the certification tests ought to be nuanced and contextual. Employment class actions typically involve a considerable amount of diversity among individual employees. In such situations, it makes sense for the court to focus on the overriding central principles as providing a common issue, rather than using the individual variations to reject certification.","PeriodicalId":262943,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Class Actions in Employment Related Disputes\",\"authors\":\"P. Spiro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2523754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional means by which workers asserted their collective rights was the union movement, but that has been in severe decline in the private sector. Class action lawsuits would appear to be the ideal modern substitute. There have been a few noteworthy successes for employees in the last few years, helping to ensure that employers in the banking sector abide by statutory requirements to provide overtime pay. Certification has proven to be a significant hurdle in these actions, and there appear to be some meritorious cases where certification was not achieved. It is arguable that the case law that has developed around the finding of a common issue for certification is too confining for the employment context. The application of the certification tests ought to be nuanced and contextual. Employment class actions typically involve a considerable amount of diversity among individual employees. In such situations, it makes sense for the court to focus on the overriding central principles as providing a common issue, rather than using the individual variations to reject certification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2523754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2523754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工人维护集体权利的传统手段是工会运动,但在私营部门,工会运动已经严重衰落。集体诉讼似乎是理想的现代替代品。在过去几年里,雇员取得了一些值得注意的成功,这些成功有助于确保银行业的雇主遵守提供加班费的法定要求。认证已被证明是这些行动中的一个重大障碍,并且似乎有一些值得称道的案例没有获得认证。有争议的是,围绕认证的共同问题的发现而发展起来的判例法对于就业环境来说过于局限。认证测试的应用应该是细致入微的和上下文相关的。雇佣集体诉讼通常涉及雇员个体之间相当大的多样性。在这种情况下,法院把重点放在压倒一切的中心原则上是有意义的,因为它提供了一个共同的问题,而不是利用个别的变化来拒绝认证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Class Actions in Employment Related Disputes
The traditional means by which workers asserted their collective rights was the union movement, but that has been in severe decline in the private sector. Class action lawsuits would appear to be the ideal modern substitute. There have been a few noteworthy successes for employees in the last few years, helping to ensure that employers in the banking sector abide by statutory requirements to provide overtime pay. Certification has proven to be a significant hurdle in these actions, and there appear to be some meritorious cases where certification was not achieved. It is arguable that the case law that has developed around the finding of a common issue for certification is too confining for the employment context. The application of the certification tests ought to be nuanced and contextual. Employment class actions typically involve a considerable amount of diversity among individual employees. In such situations, it makes sense for the court to focus on the overriding central principles as providing a common issue, rather than using the individual variations to reject certification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信