历史背景下东南欧的土地掠夺

N. Mandaci
{"title":"历史背景下东南欧的土地掠夺","authors":"N. Mandaci","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies on land grabbing in Southeast Europe suggest that parts of the region are re-experiencing in the post-socialist era what happened in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries due to the decline of the Ottoman land tenure system, under identical conditions involving fundamental sociopolitical transformations and integration with global capitalism. During these historical phases, the processes of enclosure developed in varying degrees in accord with the topographical and societal conditions of the societies as well as geographical proximity to the European capitalist centres. Today, despite growing connections with the European Union, the whole region has remained on the periphery of the capitalist Western European core, which is specialized in technology and knowledge, while retaining the position as agrarian societies and neat providers of raw materials and food to industrialized Western centres. This chapter suggests that although the regime types governing those nations change throughout historical phases, primitive accumulation practices that harm the small peasantry have been sustained so far under different banners. Land grab in those countries also invokes a public passivity, which symptomizes the prevalence of a historic bloc—as coined by Gramsci—regarding the unquestionability of the liberalization on the land system and intra-EU market dynamics and consequently the current practices of enclosure that turns land into a fictive financial asset favouring beneficiaries other than the local peasantry.","PeriodicalId":410474,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","volume":"288 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Land Grabbing in Southeastern Europe in Historical Context\",\"authors\":\"N. Mandaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent studies on land grabbing in Southeast Europe suggest that parts of the region are re-experiencing in the post-socialist era what happened in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries due to the decline of the Ottoman land tenure system, under identical conditions involving fundamental sociopolitical transformations and integration with global capitalism. During these historical phases, the processes of enclosure developed in varying degrees in accord with the topographical and societal conditions of the societies as well as geographical proximity to the European capitalist centres. Today, despite growing connections with the European Union, the whole region has remained on the periphery of the capitalist Western European core, which is specialized in technology and knowledge, while retaining the position as agrarian societies and neat providers of raw materials and food to industrialized Western centres. This chapter suggests that although the regime types governing those nations change throughout historical phases, primitive accumulation practices that harm the small peasantry have been sustained so far under different banners. Land grab in those countries also invokes a public passivity, which symptomizes the prevalence of a historic bloc—as coined by Gramsci—regarding the unquestionability of the liberalization on the land system and intra-EU market dynamics and consequently the current practices of enclosure that turns land into a fictive financial asset favouring beneficiaries other than the local peasantry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism\",\"volume\":\"288 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对东南欧土地掠夺的研究表明,该地区的部分地区在后社会主义时代重新经历了17世纪和18世纪由于奥斯曼帝国土地所有权制度的衰落而发生的事情,在涉及基本社会政治变革和与全球资本主义融合的相同条件下。在这些历史阶段,圈地的进程在不同程度上发展,与社会的地形和社会条件以及与欧洲资本主义中心的地理邻近程度相一致。今天,尽管与欧盟的联系日益密切,但整个地区仍然处于资本主义西欧核心的边缘,西欧核心专门从事技术和知识,同时保持着农业社会的地位,并为工业化的西方中心提供原材料和食品。本章表明,尽管统治这些国家的政权类型在历史的各个阶段都在变化,但伤害小农的原始积累实践在不同的旗帜下一直持续到现在。这些国家的土地掠夺也引发了公众的被动,这体现了历史集团的普遍存在——正如葛兰西所创造的那样——关于土地制度自由化和欧盟内部市场动态的不容置疑性,因此,目前的圈地做法将土地变成了有利于当地农民以外受益者的有效金融资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Land Grabbing in Southeastern Europe in Historical Context
Recent studies on land grabbing in Southeast Europe suggest that parts of the region are re-experiencing in the post-socialist era what happened in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries due to the decline of the Ottoman land tenure system, under identical conditions involving fundamental sociopolitical transformations and integration with global capitalism. During these historical phases, the processes of enclosure developed in varying degrees in accord with the topographical and societal conditions of the societies as well as geographical proximity to the European capitalist centres. Today, despite growing connections with the European Union, the whole region has remained on the periphery of the capitalist Western European core, which is specialized in technology and knowledge, while retaining the position as agrarian societies and neat providers of raw materials and food to industrialized Western centres. This chapter suggests that although the regime types governing those nations change throughout historical phases, primitive accumulation practices that harm the small peasantry have been sustained so far under different banners. Land grab in those countries also invokes a public passivity, which symptomizes the prevalence of a historic bloc—as coined by Gramsci—regarding the unquestionability of the liberalization on the land system and intra-EU market dynamics and consequently the current practices of enclosure that turns land into a fictive financial asset favouring beneficiaries other than the local peasantry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信