{"title":"有效的二维解集计算最大化的ε -指标","authors":"K. Bringmann, T. Friedrich, Patrick Klitzke","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2015.7256995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority of empirical comparisons of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are performed on synthetic benchmark functions. One of the advantages of synthetic test functions is the a-priori knowledge of the optimal Pareto front. This allows measuring the proximity to the optimal front for the solution sets returned by the different MOEAs. Such a comparison is only meaningful if the cardinality of all solution sets is bounded by some fixed k. In order to compare MOEAs to the theoretical optimum achievable with k solutions, we determine best possible ε-indicator values achievable with solution sets of size k, up to an error of δ. We present a new algorithm with runtime O(k · log2(δ-1)), which is an exponential improvement regarding the dependence on the error δ compared to all previous work. We show mathematical correctness of our algorithm and determine optimal solution sets for sets of cardinality k ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000} for the well known test suits DTLZ, ZDT, WFG and LZ09 up to error δ = 10-25.","PeriodicalId":403666,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"919 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient computation of two-dimensional solution sets maximizing the epsilon-indicator\",\"authors\":\"K. Bringmann, T. Friedrich, Patrick Klitzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2015.7256995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The majority of empirical comparisons of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are performed on synthetic benchmark functions. One of the advantages of synthetic test functions is the a-priori knowledge of the optimal Pareto front. This allows measuring the proximity to the optimal front for the solution sets returned by the different MOEAs. Such a comparison is only meaningful if the cardinality of all solution sets is bounded by some fixed k. In order to compare MOEAs to the theoretical optimum achievable with k solutions, we determine best possible ε-indicator values achievable with solution sets of size k, up to an error of δ. We present a new algorithm with runtime O(k · log2(δ-1)), which is an exponential improvement regarding the dependence on the error δ compared to all previous work. We show mathematical correctness of our algorithm and determine optimal solution sets for sets of cardinality k ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000} for the well known test suits DTLZ, ZDT, WFG and LZ09 up to error δ = 10-25.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"volume\":\"919 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7256995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7256995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficient computation of two-dimensional solution sets maximizing the epsilon-indicator
The majority of empirical comparisons of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are performed on synthetic benchmark functions. One of the advantages of synthetic test functions is the a-priori knowledge of the optimal Pareto front. This allows measuring the proximity to the optimal front for the solution sets returned by the different MOEAs. Such a comparison is only meaningful if the cardinality of all solution sets is bounded by some fixed k. In order to compare MOEAs to the theoretical optimum achievable with k solutions, we determine best possible ε-indicator values achievable with solution sets of size k, up to an error of δ. We present a new algorithm with runtime O(k · log2(δ-1)), which is an exponential improvement regarding the dependence on the error δ compared to all previous work. We show mathematical correctness of our algorithm and determine optimal solution sets for sets of cardinality k ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000} for the well known test suits DTLZ, ZDT, WFG and LZ09 up to error δ = 10-25.