Theologos Dergiades, C. Milas, Theodore Panagiotidis
{"title":"美国的失业救济申请、COVID-19限制和经济支持措施","authors":"Theologos Dergiades, C. Milas, Theodore Panagiotidis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3918769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and economic support measures (ESM) in affecting excess unemployment insurance claims in the U.S. Using a panel Vector AutoRegressive specification, we find that unemployment claims are significantly affected by both policies (NPIs and ESM), and that economic support measures mitigate partially the negative labor market consequences of NPIs.","PeriodicalId":133518,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian School of Economics","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unemployment Claims, COVID-19 Restrictions and Economic Support Measures in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Theologos Dergiades, C. Milas, Theodore Panagiotidis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3918769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and economic support measures (ESM) in affecting excess unemployment insurance claims in the U.S. Using a panel Vector AutoRegressive specification, we find that unemployment claims are significantly affected by both policies (NPIs and ESM), and that economic support measures mitigate partially the negative labor market consequences of NPIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norwegian School of Economics\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norwegian School of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian School of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unemployment Claims, COVID-19 Restrictions and Economic Support Measures in the U.S.
This paper considers the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and economic support measures (ESM) in affecting excess unemployment insurance claims in the U.S. Using a panel Vector AutoRegressive specification, we find that unemployment claims are significantly affected by both policies (NPIs and ESM), and that economic support measures mitigate partially the negative labor market consequences of NPIs.