单层与双层肠吻合术的比较研究

A. Gurung, S. Shrestha, D. Shrestha, S. Paudel, D. Shrestha, A. Shrestha, Dilip Baral
{"title":"单层与双层肠吻合术的比较研究","authors":"A. Gurung, S. Shrestha, D. Shrestha, S. Paudel, D. Shrestha, A. Shrestha, Dilip Baral","doi":"10.3126/mjpahs.v1i2.23403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the efficacy of single layer intestinal anastomosis to double layer technique in terms of anastomotic healing. \nMaterials and Methods: Fifty patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis in the Department of Surgery, Western Regional Hospital from June 2014 to May 2016 were taken for this comparative study and divided equally in two groups, 25 each (single layer and double layer). \nResults: Of the total fifty cases, twenty-five cases included in each group, there was no leakage in single layer group while 1 patient had leakage in double layer group which was statistically insignificant. \nConclusion: Single layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis is simple to carry out and is as efficacious as double layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative anastomotic leak.","PeriodicalId":256896,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Single Layer Versus Double layer Intestinal Anastomosis\",\"authors\":\"A. Gurung, S. Shrestha, D. Shrestha, S. Paudel, D. Shrestha, A. Shrestha, Dilip Baral\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/mjpahs.v1i2.23403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the efficacy of single layer intestinal anastomosis to double layer technique in terms of anastomotic healing. \\nMaterials and Methods: Fifty patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis in the Department of Surgery, Western Regional Hospital from June 2014 to May 2016 were taken for this comparative study and divided equally in two groups, 25 each (single layer and double layer). \\nResults: Of the total fifty cases, twenty-five cases included in each group, there was no leakage in single layer group while 1 patient had leakage in double layer group which was statistically insignificant. \\nConclusion: Single layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis is simple to carry out and is as efficacious as double layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative anastomotic leak.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjpahs.v1i2.23403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjpahs.v1i2.23403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较单层肠吻合术与双层肠吻合术在吻合口愈合方面的疗效。材料与方法:选取2014年6月至2016年5月在西部地区医院外科行肠吻合术的患者50例进行对比研究,平均分为两组,每组25例(单层和双层)。结果:50例患者中,每组25例,单层组无渗漏,双层组1例,差异均无统计学意义。结论:单层间断肠吻合术操作简单,在术后吻合口漏方面与双层吻合术效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Single Layer Versus Double layer Intestinal Anastomosis
Objective: To determine the efficacy of single layer intestinal anastomosis to double layer technique in terms of anastomotic healing. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis in the Department of Surgery, Western Regional Hospital from June 2014 to May 2016 were taken for this comparative study and divided equally in two groups, 25 each (single layer and double layer). Results: Of the total fifty cases, twenty-five cases included in each group, there was no leakage in single layer group while 1 patient had leakage in double layer group which was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Single layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis is simple to carry out and is as efficacious as double layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative anastomotic leak.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信