{"title":"磁盘树:一种基于胖树的异构多层存储架构","authors":"Zhikun Wang, Ke Zhou, D. Feng, Junping Liu","doi":"10.1109/SNAPI.2007.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional disk arrays have the internal bus bottleneck and can not scale well. This paper proposes Disk Tree, a novel Fat-tree based heterogeneous multi-tier storage architecture. Disk Tree is built from a collection of storage nodes, small storage appliances containing commodity disks, CPU, RAM and interconnection interfaces. Each node provides moderate levels of reliability, availability, and performance. We examine four possible configurations: striping, mirroring, logging and caching Disk Tree. We have implemented a three-tier and seven-node Disk Tree prototype and carried out extensive performance evaluations using popular benchmark for these four configurations. Depending on different I/O workloads, these four configurations perform quite differently. In general, mirroring and striping disk tree performs well on read-intensive applications while logging and caching disk tree performs well on write-intensive applications.","PeriodicalId":347839,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disk Tree: A Fat-Tree Based Heterogeneous Multi-tier Storage Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Zhikun Wang, Ke Zhou, D. Feng, Junping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SNAPI.2007.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional disk arrays have the internal bus bottleneck and can not scale well. This paper proposes Disk Tree, a novel Fat-tree based heterogeneous multi-tier storage architecture. Disk Tree is built from a collection of storage nodes, small storage appliances containing commodity disks, CPU, RAM and interconnection interfaces. Each node provides moderate levels of reliability, availability, and performance. We examine four possible configurations: striping, mirroring, logging and caching Disk Tree. We have implemented a three-tier and seven-node Disk Tree prototype and carried out extensive performance evaluations using popular benchmark for these four configurations. Depending on different I/O workloads, these four configurations perform quite differently. In general, mirroring and striping disk tree performs well on read-intensive applications while logging and caching disk tree performs well on write-intensive applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAPI.2007.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAPI.2007.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disk Tree: A Fat-Tree Based Heterogeneous Multi-tier Storage Architecture
Traditional disk arrays have the internal bus bottleneck and can not scale well. This paper proposes Disk Tree, a novel Fat-tree based heterogeneous multi-tier storage architecture. Disk Tree is built from a collection of storage nodes, small storage appliances containing commodity disks, CPU, RAM and interconnection interfaces. Each node provides moderate levels of reliability, availability, and performance. We examine four possible configurations: striping, mirroring, logging and caching Disk Tree. We have implemented a three-tier and seven-node Disk Tree prototype and carried out extensive performance evaluations using popular benchmark for these four configurations. Depending on different I/O workloads, these four configurations perform quite differently. In general, mirroring and striping disk tree performs well on read-intensive applications while logging and caching disk tree performs well on write-intensive applications.