马来西亚运动控制令(mco)期间真实效应、元认知意识和工作记忆测量的线下与线上管理比较

Chan Wai Mak, Weng-Tink Chooi
{"title":"马来西亚运动控制令(mco)期间真实效应、元认知意识和工作记忆测量的线下与线上管理比较","authors":"Chan Wai Mak, Weng-Tink Chooi","doi":"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper described how the truth effect and its relationship with metacognitive awareness and working memory was converted from a physical (offline) administration to an online study due to COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown measures. The truth effect refers to the tendency for repeated statements to be judged as more true than new statements. Processing fluency is the ease of mentally processing information. The automatic and unreflective mental system associated with processing fluency can be enhanced by repetition. Metacognitive awareness and working memory were conceptualized as a deliberate and analytical cognitive system in the current study. Fifteen offline participants and fifteen online participants were compared on measures of the truth effect, metacognitive awareness, and working memory. There were no significant differences between the offline and online groups in measures of metacognitive awareness, working memory, fluency and the truth effect, suggesting that the online administration of study measures was comparable to traditional methods of administration in a physical laboratory. Even with the small sample size, our findings suggested that statements that were presented more than once were rated significantly more true compared to new information. In conclusion, the truth effect was detected both in online and offline settings in our sample of Malaysian young adults. Our study documented how cognitive tasks can be administered in an online setting using a common teleconference application (i.e., Zoom). Our findings provide support and reference for researchers to conduct research online especially during times of restricted movements and the current climate of working and studying from home.","PeriodicalId":133740,"journal":{"name":"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARING OFFLINE AND ONLINE ADMINISTRATIONS OF MEASURES OF TRUTH EFFECT, METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND WORKING MEMORY IN MALAYSIA DURING THE MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER (MCO)\",\"authors\":\"Chan Wai Mak, Weng-Tink Chooi\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper described how the truth effect and its relationship with metacognitive awareness and working memory was converted from a physical (offline) administration to an online study due to COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown measures. The truth effect refers to the tendency for repeated statements to be judged as more true than new statements. Processing fluency is the ease of mentally processing information. The automatic and unreflective mental system associated with processing fluency can be enhanced by repetition. Metacognitive awareness and working memory were conceptualized as a deliberate and analytical cognitive system in the current study. Fifteen offline participants and fifteen online participants were compared on measures of the truth effect, metacognitive awareness, and working memory. There were no significant differences between the offline and online groups in measures of metacognitive awareness, working memory, fluency and the truth effect, suggesting that the online administration of study measures was comparable to traditional methods of administration in a physical laboratory. Even with the small sample size, our findings suggested that statements that were presented more than once were rated significantly more true compared to new information. In conclusion, the truth effect was detected both in online and offline settings in our sample of Malaysian young adults. Our study documented how cognitive tasks can be administered in an online setting using a common teleconference application (i.e., Zoom). Our findings provide support and reference for researchers to conduct research online especially during times of restricted movements and the current climate of working and studying from home.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了由于COVID-19大流行相关的封锁措施,真相效应及其与元认知意识和工作记忆的关系如何从物理(离线)管理转变为在线研究。真相效应指的是人们倾向于认为重复的陈述比新的陈述更真实。处理流畅性是指在心理上处理信息的容易程度。与处理流畅性相关的自动和非反射的心理系统可以通过重复来增强。本研究将元认知意识和工作记忆概念化为一个有意识的、分析性的认知系统。15名离线参与者和15名在线参与者在真相效应、元认知意识和工作记忆方面进行了比较。离线组和在线组在元认知意识、工作记忆、流畅性和真相效应方面没有显着差异,这表明在线管理学习措施与物理实验室的传统管理方法相当。即使样本量很小,我们的研究结果表明,与新信息相比,多次呈现的陈述被评为更真实。总之,在我们的马来西亚年轻人样本中,在在线和离线环境中都检测到了真相效应。我们的研究记录了如何使用常见的电话会议应用程序(即Zoom)在在线环境中管理认知任务。我们的研究结果为研究人员进行在线研究提供了支持和参考,特别是在行动受限和当前在家工作和学习的环境下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARING OFFLINE AND ONLINE ADMINISTRATIONS OF MEASURES OF TRUTH EFFECT, METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND WORKING MEMORY IN MALAYSIA DURING THE MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER (MCO)
This paper described how the truth effect and its relationship with metacognitive awareness and working memory was converted from a physical (offline) administration to an online study due to COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown measures. The truth effect refers to the tendency for repeated statements to be judged as more true than new statements. Processing fluency is the ease of mentally processing information. The automatic and unreflective mental system associated with processing fluency can be enhanced by repetition. Metacognitive awareness and working memory were conceptualized as a deliberate and analytical cognitive system in the current study. Fifteen offline participants and fifteen online participants were compared on measures of the truth effect, metacognitive awareness, and working memory. There were no significant differences between the offline and online groups in measures of metacognitive awareness, working memory, fluency and the truth effect, suggesting that the online administration of study measures was comparable to traditional methods of administration in a physical laboratory. Even with the small sample size, our findings suggested that statements that were presented more than once were rated significantly more true compared to new information. In conclusion, the truth effect was detected both in online and offline settings in our sample of Malaysian young adults. Our study documented how cognitive tasks can be administered in an online setting using a common teleconference application (i.e., Zoom). Our findings provide support and reference for researchers to conduct research online especially during times of restricted movements and the current climate of working and studying from home.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信