{"title":"2","authors":"Aulus Gellius","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvg2539k.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refinement . Refinement of F 2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R -factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F 2 , conventional R -factors R are based on F , with F set to zero for negative F 2 . The threshold expression of F 2 > σ ( F 2 ) is used only for calculating R -factors(gt) etc . and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R -factors based on F 2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F , and R - factors based on ALL data will be even larger.","PeriodicalId":294561,"journal":{"name":"Between Two Shores","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1871-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2\",\"authors\":\"Aulus Gellius\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvg2539k.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refinement . Refinement of F 2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R -factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F 2 , conventional R -factors R are based on F , with F set to zero for negative F 2 . The threshold expression of F 2 > σ ( F 2 ) is used only for calculating R -factors(gt) etc . and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R -factors based on F 2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F , and R - factors based on ALL data will be even larger.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Between Two Shores\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1871-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Between Two Shores\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvg2539k.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between Two Shores","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvg2539k.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refinement . Refinement of F 2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R -factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F 2 , conventional R -factors R are based on F , with F set to zero for negative F 2 . The threshold expression of F 2 > σ ( F 2 ) is used only for calculating R -factors(gt) etc . and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R -factors based on F 2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F , and R - factors based on ALL data will be even larger.