不断发展的品牌边界和期望:回顾品牌资产、品牌忠诚度和品牌形象研究向前发展

D. Parris, Francisco Guzmán
{"title":"不断发展的品牌边界和期望:回顾品牌资产、品牌忠诚度和品牌形象研究向前发展","authors":"D. Parris, Francisco Guzmán","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-06-2021-3528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to critically review the most cited literature published from 2000 to 2020 in 24 top-ranked marketing journals on the three most studied branding concepts of the 21st century – brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image – to explore how in these papers they have been defined, measured and examined, and propose how they should move forward in an era where brands are expected to be “socially and socio-politically conscious.”\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFor each concept a systematic literature review is conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, outcomes and measures for each concept were accessed and synthesized.\n\n\nFindings\nThe systematic literature reviews provide a “state-of-the-art” snapshot of each concept and collectively demonstrate there is no consensus on the independence and interdependence of these dynamic multidimensional concepts. Based on the recommended process in the measurement literature, an evolved definition of each concept is proposed. In addition to the corresponding research directions presented in the moving forward sections of each systematic literature review, common research avenues emerged.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper acknowledges these three branding concepts as dynamic (i.e. evolving over time), systemically reviews and synthesizes the extant literature, and provides a path forward to defining, measuring and exploring brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image in the present era where brands are expected to be socially and socio-politically conscious with responsibilities to the planet, people and profit.\n","PeriodicalId":114857,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving brand boundaries and expectations: looking back on brand equity, brand loyalty, and brand image research to move forward\",\"authors\":\"D. Parris, Francisco Guzmán\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpbm-06-2021-3528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to critically review the most cited literature published from 2000 to 2020 in 24 top-ranked marketing journals on the three most studied branding concepts of the 21st century – brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image – to explore how in these papers they have been defined, measured and examined, and propose how they should move forward in an era where brands are expected to be “socially and socio-politically conscious.”\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nFor each concept a systematic literature review is conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, outcomes and measures for each concept were accessed and synthesized.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe systematic literature reviews provide a “state-of-the-art” snapshot of each concept and collectively demonstrate there is no consensus on the independence and interdependence of these dynamic multidimensional concepts. Based on the recommended process in the measurement literature, an evolved definition of each concept is proposed. In addition to the corresponding research directions presented in the moving forward sections of each systematic literature review, common research avenues emerged.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper acknowledges these three branding concepts as dynamic (i.e. evolving over time), systemically reviews and synthesizes the extant literature, and provides a path forward to defining, measuring and exploring brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image in the present era where brands are expected to be socially and socio-politically conscious with responsibilities to the planet, people and profit.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":114857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Product & Brand Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Product & Brand Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-06-2021-3528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-06-2021-3528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文旨在批判性地回顾2000年至2020年间发表在24家顶级营销期刊上的被引用最多的文献,这些文献涉及21世纪研究最多的三个品牌概念——品牌资产、品牌忠诚和品牌形象——探索这些概念是如何被定义、衡量和检验的,并提出在一个品牌被期望具有“社会和社会政治意识”的时代,它们应该如何向前发展。设计/方法/方法对每个概念进行系统的文献综述。在此过程中,对每个概念的定义、前提、结果和措施进行了访问和综合。系统的文献综述提供了每个概念的“最先进的”快照,并共同证明了这些动态多维概念的独立性和相互依赖性没有共识。基于测量文献中推荐的过程,提出了每个概念的演化定义。除了在每个系统文献综述的前进部分中提出相应的研究方向外,还出现了共同的研究途径。原创性/价值本文承认这三个品牌概念是动态的(即随着时间的推移而发展),系统地回顾和综合了现有的文献,并提供了一条在当今时代定义、衡量和探索品牌资产、品牌忠诚度和品牌形象的道路,在这个时代,品牌被期望具有社会和社会政治意识,对地球、人民和利润负有责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolving brand boundaries and expectations: looking back on brand equity, brand loyalty, and brand image research to move forward
Purpose This paper aims to critically review the most cited literature published from 2000 to 2020 in 24 top-ranked marketing journals on the three most studied branding concepts of the 21st century – brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image – to explore how in these papers they have been defined, measured and examined, and propose how they should move forward in an era where brands are expected to be “socially and socio-politically conscious.” Design/methodology/approach For each concept a systematic literature review is conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, outcomes and measures for each concept were accessed and synthesized. Findings The systematic literature reviews provide a “state-of-the-art” snapshot of each concept and collectively demonstrate there is no consensus on the independence and interdependence of these dynamic multidimensional concepts. Based on the recommended process in the measurement literature, an evolved definition of each concept is proposed. In addition to the corresponding research directions presented in the moving forward sections of each systematic literature review, common research avenues emerged. Originality/value This paper acknowledges these three branding concepts as dynamic (i.e. evolving over time), systemically reviews and synthesizes the extant literature, and provides a path forward to defining, measuring and exploring brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image in the present era where brands are expected to be socially and socio-politically conscious with responsibilities to the planet, people and profit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信