应该做,可以做,可以知道:可持续性和对101个交互设计项目的其他思考

Huaxin Wei, Jeffrey C. F. Ho, Kenny K. N. Chow, S. Blevis, Eli Blevis
{"title":"应该做,可以做,可以知道:可持续性和对101个交互设计项目的其他思考","authors":"Huaxin Wei, Jeffrey C. F. Ho, Kenny K. N. Chow, S. Blevis, Eli Blevis","doi":"10.1145/3338103.3338109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper characterizes six years of final projects from an interaction design master's program at our School of Design in Hong Kong. Our reporting includes a thematic analysis of the specific application areas in which these diverse designers made their choices, along the dimensions of values and vision (Should Do), concepts and approaches (Can Do), domain knowledge (Can Know), and interactive Forms. The dimensions of Should Do and Can Do are particularly privileged in this paper. In this particular reporting of our analysis, we are especially interested in trends relating to sustainability and its relation to other values-orientations. This interest owes to our concern as a faculty for fostering a school of thinking and practice that balances all of these dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates the use and value of the Should Do, Can Do, Can Know framing as an analytical tool for design. Moreover, our work characterizes the common strategies among our 101 designers. As such, it provides a lens and points of inspiration for others, more generally. As a service, we present our entire analysis in table form as an Appendix.","PeriodicalId":447119,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing within Limits","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Do, Can Do, Can Know: Sustainability and Other Reflections on One Hundred and One Interaction Design Projects\",\"authors\":\"Huaxin Wei, Jeffrey C. F. Ho, Kenny K. N. Chow, S. Blevis, Eli Blevis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3338103.3338109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper characterizes six years of final projects from an interaction design master's program at our School of Design in Hong Kong. Our reporting includes a thematic analysis of the specific application areas in which these diverse designers made their choices, along the dimensions of values and vision (Should Do), concepts and approaches (Can Do), domain knowledge (Can Know), and interactive Forms. The dimensions of Should Do and Can Do are particularly privileged in this paper. In this particular reporting of our analysis, we are especially interested in trends relating to sustainability and its relation to other values-orientations. This interest owes to our concern as a faculty for fostering a school of thinking and practice that balances all of these dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates the use and value of the Should Do, Can Do, Can Know framing as an analytical tool for design. Moreover, our work characterizes the common strategies among our 101 designers. As such, it provides a lens and points of inspiration for others, more generally. As a service, we present our entire analysis in table form as an Appendix.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing within Limits\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing within Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3338103.3338109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing within Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3338103.3338109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文描述了我们香港设计学院交互设计硕士课程6年的期末项目。我们的报告包括对这些不同设计师做出选择的特定应用领域的专题分析,以及价值观和愿景(应该做)、概念和方法(可以做)、领域知识(可以知道)和互动形式的维度。“应该做”和“可以做”这两个维度在本文中尤为突出。在我们的分析报告中,我们对可持续发展趋势及其与其他价值取向的关系特别感兴趣。这种兴趣源于我们作为一名教师对培养一个平衡所有这些方面的思想和实践学派的关注。我们的分析证明了“应该做、可以做、可以知道”框架作为设计分析工具的用途和价值。此外,我们的工作体现了101位设计师的共同策略。因此,它为其他人提供了一个镜头和灵感点,更广泛地说。作为一项服务,我们将整个分析以表格的形式作为附录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should Do, Can Do, Can Know: Sustainability and Other Reflections on One Hundred and One Interaction Design Projects
This paper characterizes six years of final projects from an interaction design master's program at our School of Design in Hong Kong. Our reporting includes a thematic analysis of the specific application areas in which these diverse designers made their choices, along the dimensions of values and vision (Should Do), concepts and approaches (Can Do), domain knowledge (Can Know), and interactive Forms. The dimensions of Should Do and Can Do are particularly privileged in this paper. In this particular reporting of our analysis, we are especially interested in trends relating to sustainability and its relation to other values-orientations. This interest owes to our concern as a faculty for fostering a school of thinking and practice that balances all of these dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates the use and value of the Should Do, Can Do, Can Know framing as an analytical tool for design. Moreover, our work characterizes the common strategies among our 101 designers. As such, it provides a lens and points of inspiration for others, more generally. As a service, we present our entire analysis in table form as an Appendix.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信