{"title":"数据存储的性能比较- db40和MySQL数据库","authors":"Sudhanshu Kulshrestha, Shelly Sachdeva","doi":"10.1109/IC3.2014.6897167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Choice of right and appropriate database is always crucial for any information system. Since database is an integral and important part, we choose to write the performance analysis of different type of databases in context to health care data. Health care database consists of Electronic Health Records. Also, various Electronic Health Record standards like HL7, openEHR and CEN EN 13606 have been defined for relational, object and object-relational databases. So far, none of the standard has been defined using object-database. In order to do so, we must compare and analyze the performance of object-database over others. In this paper, firstly we have studied the current trends in Indian Health Care with respect to medical data storage and retrieval. Next, we have compared the performance of MySQL (relational) and Db4o (object) database in terms of persistence time and storage space for a sample hospital data of 100 users.","PeriodicalId":444918,"journal":{"name":"2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison for data storage - Db4o and MySQL databases\",\"authors\":\"Sudhanshu Kulshrestha, Shelly Sachdeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3.2014.6897167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Choice of right and appropriate database is always crucial for any information system. Since database is an integral and important part, we choose to write the performance analysis of different type of databases in context to health care data. Health care database consists of Electronic Health Records. Also, various Electronic Health Record standards like HL7, openEHR and CEN EN 13606 have been defined for relational, object and object-relational databases. So far, none of the standard has been defined using object-database. In order to do so, we must compare and analyze the performance of object-database over others. In this paper, firstly we have studied the current trends in Indian Health Care with respect to medical data storage and retrieval. Next, we have compared the performance of MySQL (relational) and Db4o (object) database in terms of persistence time and storage space for a sample hospital data of 100 users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2014.6897167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2014.6897167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
选择合适的数据库对于任何信息系统都是至关重要的。由于数据库是一个不可或缺的重要组成部分，所以我们选择将不同类型的数据库在上下文中的性能分析写在医疗保健数据上。卫生保健数据库由电子健康记录组成。此外，还为关系数据库、对象数据库和对象-关系数据库定义了各种电子健康记录标准，如HL7、openEHR和CEN EN 13606。到目前为止，还没有一个标准是使用对象数据库定义的。为了做到这一点，我们必须比较和分析对象数据库与其他数据库的性能。在本文中，我们首先研究了印度卫生保健在医疗数据存储和检索方面的当前趋势。接下来，我们比较了MySQL(关系型)数据库和db40(对象型)数据库在持久性时间和存储空间方面的性能，用于100个用户的医院样本数据。
Performance comparison for data storage - Db4o and MySQL databases
Choice of right and appropriate database is always crucial for any information system. Since database is an integral and important part, we choose to write the performance analysis of different type of databases in context to health care data. Health care database consists of Electronic Health Records. Also, various Electronic Health Record standards like HL7, openEHR and CEN EN 13606 have been defined for relational, object and object-relational databases. So far, none of the standard has been defined using object-database. In order to do so, we must compare and analyze the performance of object-database over others. In this paper, firstly we have studied the current trends in Indian Health Care with respect to medical data storage and retrieval. Next, we have compared the performance of MySQL (relational) and Db4o (object) database in terms of persistence time and storage space for a sample hospital data of 100 users.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
