1900年以来伊丽莎白和詹姆士一世戏剧研究

Arthur C. L. Brown
{"title":"1900年以来伊丽莎白和詹姆士一世戏剧研究","authors":"Arthur C. L. Brown","doi":"10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Towards the end of his article, \"Studies in the Elizabethan Stage Since 1900,\" in Shakespeare Survey f I (1948)» Allardyce Nicoli considered future lines of research in this field and remarked, \"the already existent inquiries into particular, as opposed to general, problems have been seen to have yielded matter of prime interest. We need more of these, conducted with the most rigorous selectivity . w The same principle applies, I believe, to the material to be considered in this paper. A survey of the work produced on Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (excluding Shakespeare for this purpose) over the last sixty years reveals fairly clearly a retreat from studie« with the wide sweep of F. E. Schelling1 s Drama 1558-l6¿2 or W. Creizenach's JJig Ehelish Drama ¿n j£§ Ago Shakespeare: their place has bean taken, in general, by more detailed examinations of the work of individual authors, of individual plays, of distinctive dramatic forms, and by special izad studies of theatres, companies, and acting technique. Bibliographical and textual studies have placed a salutary check on fanciful interpretation and emendation, and have shown how dangerously little is still known about the essential basis of all our work-the author1 s text and its transmission» The half-century has, in short, tended to be a period of stock-taking, old ideas being subjected to a more critical scrutiny in the light of, for example, more detailed knowledge arising from now documentary evidence, and new ideas tending to be based more firmly on evidence as opposed to conjecture and, as a result, tending to be more limited in scope. It is a stock-taking which no one will regret; it is by no moans yet approaching its end,","PeriodicalId":275331,"journal":{"name":"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1959-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STUDIES IN ELIZABETHAN AND JACOBEAN DRAMA SINCE 1900\",\"authors\":\"Arthur C. L. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Towards the end of his article, \\\"Studies in the Elizabethan Stage Since 1900,\\\" in Shakespeare Survey f I (1948)» Allardyce Nicoli considered future lines of research in this field and remarked, \\\"the already existent inquiries into particular, as opposed to general, problems have been seen to have yielded matter of prime interest. We need more of these, conducted with the most rigorous selectivity . w The same principle applies, I believe, to the material to be considered in this paper. A survey of the work produced on Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (excluding Shakespeare for this purpose) over the last sixty years reveals fairly clearly a retreat from studie« with the wide sweep of F. E. Schelling1 s Drama 1558-l6¿2 or W. Creizenach's JJig Ehelish Drama ¿n j£§ Ago Shakespeare: their place has bean taken, in general, by more detailed examinations of the work of individual authors, of individual plays, of distinctive dramatic forms, and by special izad studies of theatres, companies, and acting technique. Bibliographical and textual studies have placed a salutary check on fanciful interpretation and emendation, and have shown how dangerously little is still known about the essential basis of all our work-the author1 s text and its transmission» The half-century has, in short, tended to be a period of stock-taking, old ideas being subjected to a more critical scrutiny in the light of, for example, more detailed knowledge arising from now documentary evidence, and new ideas tending to be based more firmly on evidence as opposed to conjecture and, as a result, tending to be more limited in scope. It is a stock-taking which no one will regret; it is by no moans yet approaching its end,\",\"PeriodicalId\":275331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1959-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阿勒代斯·尼科利在《莎士比亚概览1》(1948)的文章《1900年以来伊丽莎白时期的研究》的末尾考虑了这一领域未来的研究方向,他说:“已经存在的对特定问题的研究,而不是对一般问题的研究,已经被视为产生了主要兴趣的问题。”我们需要更多这样的实验,以最严格的选择性进行。我相信,同样的原则也适用于本文所要考虑的材料。在过去的六十年里,对伊丽莎白和詹姆士一世戏剧(不包括莎士比亚)的调查显示,相当清楚地显示了一种对研究的退却,“与F. E.谢林的戏剧1558- 16年的广泛席卷或W. Creizenach的JJig Ehelish戏剧”。一般来说,它们的地位已被对个别作者、个别戏剧、独特戏剧形式的作品进行更详细的研究,以及对剧院、剧团和表演技巧的专门研究所取代。参考书目和文本研究对奇思妙想的解释和修订进行了有益的检查,并表明对我们所有工作的基本基础——作者的文本及其传播——仍然知之甚少,这是多么危险。“简而言之,半个世纪往往是一个盘点的时期,旧思想受到更严格的审查,例如,根据现在的文献证据产生的更详细的知识,新的想法往往更牢固地建立在证据而不是猜测的基础上,因此,在范围上往往更有限。这是一次没有人会后悔的盘点;它还没有呻吟着接近它的终点,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STUDIES IN ELIZABETHAN AND JACOBEAN DRAMA SINCE 1900
Towards the end of his article, "Studies in the Elizabethan Stage Since 1900," in Shakespeare Survey f I (1948)» Allardyce Nicoli considered future lines of research in this field and remarked, "the already existent inquiries into particular, as opposed to general, problems have been seen to have yielded matter of prime interest. We need more of these, conducted with the most rigorous selectivity . w The same principle applies, I believe, to the material to be considered in this paper. A survey of the work produced on Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (excluding Shakespeare for this purpose) over the last sixty years reveals fairly clearly a retreat from studie« with the wide sweep of F. E. Schelling1 s Drama 1558-l6¿2 or W. Creizenach's JJig Ehelish Drama ¿n j£§ Ago Shakespeare: their place has bean taken, in general, by more detailed examinations of the work of individual authors, of individual plays, of distinctive dramatic forms, and by special izad studies of theatres, companies, and acting technique. Bibliographical and textual studies have placed a salutary check on fanciful interpretation and emendation, and have shown how dangerously little is still known about the essential basis of all our work-the author1 s text and its transmission» The half-century has, in short, tended to be a period of stock-taking, old ideas being subjected to a more critical scrutiny in the light of, for example, more detailed knowledge arising from now documentary evidence, and new ideas tending to be based more firmly on evidence as opposed to conjecture and, as a result, tending to be more limited in scope. It is a stock-taking which no one will regret; it is by no moans yet approaching its end,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信