深空ka波段链路优先级数据保护:先发制人重传vs余量。

S. Shambayati
{"title":"深空ka波段链路优先级数据保护:先发制人重传vs余量。","authors":"S. Shambayati","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2009.4839390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the performance of two preemptive retransmission schemes for protection of priority data over deep-space Ka-band links is evaluated. The first scheme merges the correctly received bit from each transmission to create the most complete set of priority data for each pass (bit merge). The second scheme (symbol combining) combines the soft symbols received from each transmission of the priority data to increase the priority data's signal to noise ratio (SNR), thus increasing the likelihood of their correct reception. These performances were then compared to an equivalent margin scheme in which the data rate used for the transmission of the priority data is reduced by a factor equal to the number of transmissions of the priority data. The performance of each scheme was evaluated through emulation using Water Vapor Radiometer (WVR) and Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer (AWVR) sky brightness temperature measurements along with models for Deep Space Network (DSN) Ka-band capable antenna using Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's DSN tracking schedule and geometry. The results indicate that “bit merge” and “reduced rate” schemes perform roughly the same in terms of availability of the priority data (at least 97% compared to 93% without any data protections scheme) but for “bit merge” priority data losses occur over fewer passes than for the “reduced rate” scheme. The “symbol combining” scheme is superior to both the “bit merge” and the “reduced rate” schemes with at least 98.5% priority data availability with losses over a small number of passes. Receivers have a minimum demodulation threshold SNR and combining algorithms have combining losses; therefore, the performance of the “symbol combining” scheme was also evaluated with respect to these two factors. The results indicate that even with current receivers, the “symbol combining” scheme performs extremely well and the scheme is relatively robust with respect to combining losses.","PeriodicalId":117250,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Aerospace conference","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep-space Ka-band link priority data protection: Preemptive retransmission vs. margin.\",\"authors\":\"S. Shambayati\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO.2009.4839390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the performance of two preemptive retransmission schemes for protection of priority data over deep-space Ka-band links is evaluated. The first scheme merges the correctly received bit from each transmission to create the most complete set of priority data for each pass (bit merge). The second scheme (symbol combining) combines the soft symbols received from each transmission of the priority data to increase the priority data's signal to noise ratio (SNR), thus increasing the likelihood of their correct reception. These performances were then compared to an equivalent margin scheme in which the data rate used for the transmission of the priority data is reduced by a factor equal to the number of transmissions of the priority data. The performance of each scheme was evaluated through emulation using Water Vapor Radiometer (WVR) and Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer (AWVR) sky brightness temperature measurements along with models for Deep Space Network (DSN) Ka-band capable antenna using Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's DSN tracking schedule and geometry. The results indicate that “bit merge” and “reduced rate” schemes perform roughly the same in terms of availability of the priority data (at least 97% compared to 93% without any data protections scheme) but for “bit merge” priority data losses occur over fewer passes than for the “reduced rate” scheme. The “symbol combining” scheme is superior to both the “bit merge” and the “reduced rate” schemes with at least 98.5% priority data availability with losses over a small number of passes. Receivers have a minimum demodulation threshold SNR and combining algorithms have combining losses; therefore, the performance of the “symbol combining” scheme was also evaluated with respect to these two factors. The results indicate that even with current receivers, the “symbol combining” scheme performs extremely well and the scheme is relatively robust with respect to combining losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Aerospace conference\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Aerospace conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2009.4839390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Aerospace conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2009.4839390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对深空ka波段链路上保护优先级数据的两种抢占式重传方案的性能进行了评价。第一种方案合并来自每次传输的正确接收的位,为每次传输创建最完整的优先级数据集(位合并)。第二种方案(符号组合)是将优先级数据每次传输接收到的软符号进行组合,提高优先级数据的信噪比,从而提高其正确接收的可能性。然后将这些性能与等效余量方案进行比较,其中用于传输优先级数据的数据速率降低了与优先级数据传输次数相等的系数。利用火星侦察轨道器的深空网络(DSN) ka波段天线跟踪时间表和几何模型,利用水蒸气辐射计(WVR)和先进水蒸气辐射计(AWVR)的天空亮度温度测量数据,对每种方案的性能进行了仿真评估。结果表明,“比特合并”和“降低速率”方案在优先级数据的可用性方面表现大致相同(至少97%,而没有任何数据保护方案为93%),但“比特合并”优先级数据丢失发生在比“降低速率”方案更少的通道上。“符号组合”方案优于“位合并”和“降低速率”方案,至少具有98.5%的优先级数据可用性,并且在少量通过时丢失。接收机具有最小的解调阈值信噪比,组合算法具有组合损耗;因此,也就这两个因素对“符号组合”方案的性能进行了评价。结果表明,即使在现有的接收机上,“符号合并”方案也表现得非常好,并且该方案在合并损失方面具有相对的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep-space Ka-band link priority data protection: Preemptive retransmission vs. margin.
In this paper the performance of two preemptive retransmission schemes for protection of priority data over deep-space Ka-band links is evaluated. The first scheme merges the correctly received bit from each transmission to create the most complete set of priority data for each pass (bit merge). The second scheme (symbol combining) combines the soft symbols received from each transmission of the priority data to increase the priority data's signal to noise ratio (SNR), thus increasing the likelihood of their correct reception. These performances were then compared to an equivalent margin scheme in which the data rate used for the transmission of the priority data is reduced by a factor equal to the number of transmissions of the priority data. The performance of each scheme was evaluated through emulation using Water Vapor Radiometer (WVR) and Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer (AWVR) sky brightness temperature measurements along with models for Deep Space Network (DSN) Ka-band capable antenna using Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's DSN tracking schedule and geometry. The results indicate that “bit merge” and “reduced rate” schemes perform roughly the same in terms of availability of the priority data (at least 97% compared to 93% without any data protections scheme) but for “bit merge” priority data losses occur over fewer passes than for the “reduced rate” scheme. The “symbol combining” scheme is superior to both the “bit merge” and the “reduced rate” schemes with at least 98.5% priority data availability with losses over a small number of passes. Receivers have a minimum demodulation threshold SNR and combining algorithms have combining losses; therefore, the performance of the “symbol combining” scheme was also evaluated with respect to these two factors. The results indicate that even with current receivers, the “symbol combining” scheme performs extremely well and the scheme is relatively robust with respect to combining losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信