{"title":"不同辐照度下树脂复合材料的聚合行为","authors":"T. Yoshikawa, A. Sadr, J. Tagami","doi":"10.47416/apjod.20-0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the microhardness and hardness ratios of hybrid resin composites using different irradiance lights. Materials and Methods: Light-curing units were light emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit (Demi Ultra). The lightcured resin composites were Clearfil AP-X (shade A3) and Clearfil Photo Bright (shade US). Composite specimens of 2mm thickness were polymerized in Teflon molds using an energy density of 24,000 mJ/cm2. Light irradiances were 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s and 600 mW/cm2 40 s. Just after light curing, the Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured at the top and bottom surfaces of each specimen using a hardness tester. The hardness ratio was calculated as follows: KHN of bottom surface/KHN. All experiments were performed at room temperature of 23 ± 2 ̊C with humidity of 50 ± 10%. Results: Immediately after light curing, the KHN at the bottom surfaces of resin composites was significantly lower than that at the top surfaces for every group (p < 0.05). The 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s showed significantly smaller hardness ratio compared with that of the 600 mW/cm2 40 s for both Clearfil AP-X and Clearfil Photo Bright resin composites (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When the energy density was the same, the polymerization of resin composites at the bottom surface was more inhibited than that of at the top surface using high-irradiance light. (Asian Pac J Dent 2020; 20: 25-28. doi: 10.47416/apjod.20-0275)","PeriodicalId":433454,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polymerization behavior of resin composites using different irradiance lights\",\"authors\":\"T. Yoshikawa, A. Sadr, J. Tagami\",\"doi\":\"10.47416/apjod.20-0275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the microhardness and hardness ratios of hybrid resin composites using different irradiance lights. Materials and Methods: Light-curing units were light emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit (Demi Ultra). The lightcured resin composites were Clearfil AP-X (shade A3) and Clearfil Photo Bright (shade US). Composite specimens of 2mm thickness were polymerized in Teflon molds using an energy density of 24,000 mJ/cm2. Light irradiances were 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s and 600 mW/cm2 40 s. Just after light curing, the Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured at the top and bottom surfaces of each specimen using a hardness tester. The hardness ratio was calculated as follows: KHN of bottom surface/KHN. All experiments were performed at room temperature of 23 ± 2 ̊C with humidity of 50 ± 10%. Results: Immediately after light curing, the KHN at the bottom surfaces of resin composites was significantly lower than that at the top surfaces for every group (p < 0.05). The 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s showed significantly smaller hardness ratio compared with that of the 600 mW/cm2 40 s for both Clearfil AP-X and Clearfil Photo Bright resin composites (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When the energy density was the same, the polymerization of resin composites at the bottom surface was more inhibited than that of at the top surface using high-irradiance light. (Asian Pac J Dent 2020; 20: 25-28. doi: 10.47416/apjod.20-0275)\",\"PeriodicalId\":433454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47416/apjod.20-0275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47416/apjod.20-0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Polymerization behavior of resin composites using different irradiance lights
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the microhardness and hardness ratios of hybrid resin composites using different irradiance lights. Materials and Methods: Light-curing units were light emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit (Demi Ultra). The lightcured resin composites were Clearfil AP-X (shade A3) and Clearfil Photo Bright (shade US). Composite specimens of 2mm thickness were polymerized in Teflon molds using an energy density of 24,000 mJ/cm2. Light irradiances were 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s and 600 mW/cm2 40 s. Just after light curing, the Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured at the top and bottom surfaces of each specimen using a hardness tester. The hardness ratio was calculated as follows: KHN of bottom surface/KHN. All experiments were performed at room temperature of 23 ± 2 ̊C with humidity of 50 ± 10%. Results: Immediately after light curing, the KHN at the bottom surfaces of resin composites was significantly lower than that at the top surfaces for every group (p < 0.05). The 1,200 mW/cm2 20 s showed significantly smaller hardness ratio compared with that of the 600 mW/cm2 40 s for both Clearfil AP-X and Clearfil Photo Bright resin composites (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When the energy density was the same, the polymerization of resin composites at the bottom surface was more inhibited than that of at the top surface using high-irradiance light. (Asian Pac J Dent 2020; 20: 25-28. doi: 10.47416/apjod.20-0275)