口服抗凝治疗心房颤动导管消融患者自发回声造影的患病率及临床相关性

Grebmer Christian, Lennerz Carsten, Brkic Amir, B. Patrick, W. Severin, Semmler Verena, Kottmaier Marc, Bourier Felix, F. Lena, R. Elena, B. Stephanie, Kornmayer Marie, Telishevska Marta, Reents Tilko, K. Christof, Hessling Gabriele, Deisenhofer Isabel
{"title":"口服抗凝治疗心房颤动导管消融患者自发回声造影的患病率及临床相关性","authors":"Grebmer Christian, Lennerz Carsten, Brkic Amir, B. Patrick, W. Severin, Semmler Verena, Kottmaier Marc, Bourier Felix, F. Lena, R. Elena, B. Stephanie, Kornmayer Marie, Telishevska Marta, Reents Tilko, K. Christof, Hessling Gabriele, Deisenhofer Isabel","doi":"10.23937/2378-2951/1410151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with an increased risk of cerebral embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly prescribed as first-line therapy and have shown a comparable benefit-risk ratio compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The aim of this study was to investigate whether NOACs decrease the incidence of SEC compared to VKA. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 542 patients who underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) prior to AF ablation at our institution. SEC was characterised by dynamic, smoke-like echoes within the LA cavity or LAA on TEE. Results: SEC was detected in 58 patients (10.7%) and occurred significantly more often in patients on VKA (n = 39; 13.6%) compared to patients on NOACs (n = 19, 7.5%; p = 0.02). Decreased left ventricular function (p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (p < 0.001), LA enlargement (p < 0.001) and AF during TEE (p < 0.001) were significantly more often observed in patients showing SEC. Transient ischemic attack or stroke did not occur in any patient during AF ablation. Conclusion: The incidence of SEC on TEE in patients prior to AF ablation was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs as compared to patients treated with VKA. Patients with multiple risk factors showed a higher SEC incidence. The results support the recommendation of NOACs as firstline oral anticoagulation in non-valvular AF.","PeriodicalId":112011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Grebmer Christian, Lennerz Carsten, Brkic Amir, B. Patrick, W. Severin, Semmler Verena, Kottmaier Marc, Bourier Felix, F. Lena, R. Elena, B. Stephanie, Kornmayer Marie, Telishevska Marta, Reents Tilko, K. Christof, Hessling Gabriele, Deisenhofer Isabel\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-2951/1410151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with an increased risk of cerebral embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly prescribed as first-line therapy and have shown a comparable benefit-risk ratio compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The aim of this study was to investigate whether NOACs decrease the incidence of SEC compared to VKA. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 542 patients who underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) prior to AF ablation at our institution. SEC was characterised by dynamic, smoke-like echoes within the LA cavity or LAA on TEE. Results: SEC was detected in 58 patients (10.7%) and occurred significantly more often in patients on VKA (n = 39; 13.6%) compared to patients on NOACs (n = 19, 7.5%; p = 0.02). Decreased left ventricular function (p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (p < 0.001), LA enlargement (p < 0.001) and AF during TEE (p < 0.001) were significantly more often observed in patients showing SEC. Transient ischemic attack or stroke did not occur in any patient during AF ablation. Conclusion: The incidence of SEC on TEE in patients prior to AF ablation was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs as compared to patients treated with VKA. Patients with multiple risk factors showed a higher SEC incidence. The results support the recommendation of NOACs as firstline oral anticoagulation in non-valvular AF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心耳(LAA)自发性回声造影(SEC)与心房颤动(AF)患者脑栓塞风险增加相关。新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)越来越多地被用作一线治疗,并且与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)相比显示出相当的获益-风险比。本研究的目的是探讨与VKA相比,NOACs是否能降低SEC的发生率。方法:我们回顾性分析了542例经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查的心房颤动消融患者。SEC的特征是在TEE上的LA腔或LAA内动态的烟雾状回声。结果:58例患者(10.7%)检测到SEC,且在VKA患者中发生率明显更高(n = 39;13.6%)与NOACs患者相比(n = 19, 7.5%;P = 0.02)。在有SEC的患者中,TEE期间左心室功能下降(p < 0.001)、动脉高血压(p < 0.001)、LA增大(p < 0.001)和房颤(p < 0.001)更为常见。房颤消融期间,没有任何患者发生短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中。结论:与VKA治疗的患者相比,NOACs治疗AF消融前TEE上SEC的发生率明显降低。有多种危险因素的患者SEC发生率较高。结果支持NOACs作为非瓣膜性房颤一线口服抗凝剂的推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Background: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with an increased risk of cerebral embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly prescribed as first-line therapy and have shown a comparable benefit-risk ratio compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The aim of this study was to investigate whether NOACs decrease the incidence of SEC compared to VKA. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 542 patients who underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) prior to AF ablation at our institution. SEC was characterised by dynamic, smoke-like echoes within the LA cavity or LAA on TEE. Results: SEC was detected in 58 patients (10.7%) and occurred significantly more often in patients on VKA (n = 39; 13.6%) compared to patients on NOACs (n = 19, 7.5%; p = 0.02). Decreased left ventricular function (p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (p < 0.001), LA enlargement (p < 0.001) and AF during TEE (p < 0.001) were significantly more often observed in patients showing SEC. Transient ischemic attack or stroke did not occur in any patient during AF ablation. Conclusion: The incidence of SEC on TEE in patients prior to AF ablation was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs as compared to patients treated with VKA. Patients with multiple risk factors showed a higher SEC incidence. The results support the recommendation of NOACs as firstline oral anticoagulation in non-valvular AF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信