关于IT专业人员的构建理论:分类法或类型学是答案吗?

T. Shaw, S. Pawlowski, James B. Davis
{"title":"关于IT专业人员的构建理论:分类法或类型学是答案吗?","authors":"T. Shaw, S. Pawlowski, James B. Davis","doi":"10.1145/1055973.1055976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major barrier to our ability to integrate studies and build cumulative theory about IT jobs and IT workers is the lack of consistency in terminology and conceptualizations of the profession, the jobs within the profession and the salient characteristics of those jobs. The purpose of this research is to examine how two different approaches - an IT jobs taxonomy or IT jobs typology - could be used to provide a standard framework to address this issue. The paper includes illustrations of the problem and overviews of the two approaches.","PeriodicalId":318957,"journal":{"name":"SIGMIS CPR '05","volume":"212 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building theory about IT professionals: is a taxonomy or typology the answer?\",\"authors\":\"T. Shaw, S. Pawlowski, James B. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1055973.1055976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A major barrier to our ability to integrate studies and build cumulative theory about IT jobs and IT workers is the lack of consistency in terminology and conceptualizations of the profession, the jobs within the profession and the salient characteristics of those jobs. The purpose of this research is to examine how two different approaches - an IT jobs taxonomy or IT jobs typology - could be used to provide a standard framework to address this issue. The paper includes illustrations of the problem and overviews of the two approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGMIS CPR '05\",\"volume\":\"212 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGMIS CPR '05\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1055973.1055976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMIS CPR '05","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1055973.1055976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们整合研究和建立关于IT工作和IT工作者的累积理论的能力的一个主要障碍是专业术语和概念缺乏一致性,专业中的工作和这些工作的显著特征。本研究的目的是研究如何使用两种不同的方法(IT作业分类法或IT作业类型学)来提供解决此问题的标准框架。本文包括问题的说明和两种方法的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building theory about IT professionals: is a taxonomy or typology the answer?
A major barrier to our ability to integrate studies and build cumulative theory about IT jobs and IT workers is the lack of consistency in terminology and conceptualizations of the profession, the jobs within the profession and the salient characteristics of those jobs. The purpose of this research is to examine how two different approaches - an IT jobs taxonomy or IT jobs typology - could be used to provide a standard framework to address this issue. The paper includes illustrations of the problem and overviews of the two approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信