评估Leapfrog集团对重症监护病房医师配置标准的影响

Peter J. Pronovost MD, PhD , David A. Thompson DNSc, MS, RN , Christine G. Holzmueller , Todd Dorman MD , Barbara A. Rudolph PhD, MSSW
{"title":"评估Leapfrog集团对重症监护病房医师配置标准的影响","authors":"Peter J. Pronovost MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David A. Thompson DNSc, MS, RN ,&nbsp;Christine G. Holzmueller ,&nbsp;Todd Dorman MD ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Rudolph PhD, MSSW","doi":"10.1053/j.sane.2004.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is growing concern over the quality and escalating costs of health care in the US. This paper reviews the Leapfrog Group’s ICU Physician Staffing (IPS) standard, summarizes evidence supporting the standard, reviews the cost of implementing the standard, and discusses the impact of the standard on critical care in the US. The IPS standard requires that all patients in adult or pediatric general medical and/or surgical ICUs be managed or co-managed by physicians certified in critical care medicine. A systematic review of the literature demonstrated high intensity physician staffing (e.g. intensivists manage all patients) was associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. Interviews with authors from 19 studies demonstrated that the IPS requirement for pager response and weekday and weekend hours were supported by the evidence. Cost savings estimates with IPS ranged from $510,000 to $3.3 million (greater savings in larger ICUs). The impact of the IPS is unknown, although most hospitals in the original 6 regional rollouts made efforts to implement IPS. Given the results from this study, if IPS were implemented nationally, up to 134,000 lives could be saved annually with most hospitals incurring a net savings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":82686,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.sane.2004.11.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of the Leapfrog Group’s standard for Intensive Care Unit physician staffing\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. Pronovost MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David A. Thompson DNSc, MS, RN ,&nbsp;Christine G. Holzmueller ,&nbsp;Todd Dorman MD ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Rudolph PhD, MSSW\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sane.2004.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is growing concern over the quality and escalating costs of health care in the US. This paper reviews the Leapfrog Group’s ICU Physician Staffing (IPS) standard, summarizes evidence supporting the standard, reviews the cost of implementing the standard, and discusses the impact of the standard on critical care in the US. The IPS standard requires that all patients in adult or pediatric general medical and/or surgical ICUs be managed or co-managed by physicians certified in critical care medicine. A systematic review of the literature demonstrated high intensity physician staffing (e.g. intensivists manage all patients) was associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. Interviews with authors from 19 studies demonstrated that the IPS requirement for pager response and weekday and weekend hours were supported by the evidence. Cost savings estimates with IPS ranged from $510,000 to $3.3 million (greater savings in larger ICUs). The impact of the IPS is unknown, although most hospitals in the original 6 regional rollouts made efforts to implement IPS. Given the results from this study, if IPS were implemented nationally, up to 134,000 lives could be saved annually with most hospitals incurring a net savings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.sane.2004.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277032604000601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277032604000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

人们越来越担心美国医疗保健的质量和不断上升的成本。本文回顾了Leapfrog集团的ICU医师配置(IPS)标准,总结了支持该标准的证据,回顾了实施该标准的成本,并讨论了该标准对美国重症监护的影响。IPS标准要求成人或儿童普通内科和/或外科icu的所有患者由获得重症监护医学认证的医生管理或共同管理。对文献的系统回顾表明,高强度的医生配备(例如,重症监护医师管理所有患者)与医院死亡率降低30%和ICU死亡率降低40%相关。对来自19项研究的作者的访谈表明,对寻呼机反应和工作日和周末时间的IPS要求得到了证据的支持。使用IPS可节省的成本估计在51万美元到330万美元之间(大型icu可节省更多成本)。IPS的影响尚不清楚,尽管最初6个地区推出的大多数医院都努力实施IPS。鉴于这项研究的结果,如果在全国范围内实施IPS,每年可挽救多达13.4万人的生命,大多数医院将获得净节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the impact of the Leapfrog Group’s standard for Intensive Care Unit physician staffing

There is growing concern over the quality and escalating costs of health care in the US. This paper reviews the Leapfrog Group’s ICU Physician Staffing (IPS) standard, summarizes evidence supporting the standard, reviews the cost of implementing the standard, and discusses the impact of the standard on critical care in the US. The IPS standard requires that all patients in adult or pediatric general medical and/or surgical ICUs be managed or co-managed by physicians certified in critical care medicine. A systematic review of the literature demonstrated high intensity physician staffing (e.g. intensivists manage all patients) was associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. Interviews with authors from 19 studies demonstrated that the IPS requirement for pager response and weekday and weekend hours were supported by the evidence. Cost savings estimates with IPS ranged from $510,000 to $3.3 million (greater savings in larger ICUs). The impact of the IPS is unknown, although most hospitals in the original 6 regional rollouts made efforts to implement IPS. Given the results from this study, if IPS were implemented nationally, up to 134,000 lives could be saved annually with most hospitals incurring a net savings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信