济南方言与太原方言焦点语音实现对比研究

Duan Wenjun, Jia Yuan
{"title":"济南方言与太原方言焦点语音实现对比研究","authors":"Duan Wenjun, Jia Yuan","doi":"10.1109/ICSDA.2015.7357863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is usually considered that focus bears communicative function in discourse, each language has its own ways to realize focus. This paper compares the focus realization of Jinan dialect and Taiyuan dialect. It aims to investigate the similarity and difference of focus realization through examining the variations of mean F0, duration and intensity in both focused and unfocused conditions between these two dialects. The data represents that F0 is the closest acoustic correlate with focus in both dialects. Suppressing the pitch range in the post-focus region and leaving the pitch range of the pre-focus syllables unchanged exist in all the dialects; meanwhile, focus in Jinan dialect is also realized by expanding the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus, but in Taiyuan dialect the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus doesn't observed significant expanding. Furthermore, no obvious differences in syllable duration and intensity between the focused and unfocused condition are discovered in all these dialects.","PeriodicalId":290790,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with 2015 Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrastive study of focus phonetic realization between Jinan dialect and Taiyuan dialect\",\"authors\":\"Duan Wenjun, Jia Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSDA.2015.7357863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is usually considered that focus bears communicative function in discourse, each language has its own ways to realize focus. This paper compares the focus realization of Jinan dialect and Taiyuan dialect. It aims to investigate the similarity and difference of focus realization through examining the variations of mean F0, duration and intensity in both focused and unfocused conditions between these two dialects. The data represents that F0 is the closest acoustic correlate with focus in both dialects. Suppressing the pitch range in the post-focus region and leaving the pitch range of the pre-focus syllables unchanged exist in all the dialects; meanwhile, focus in Jinan dialect is also realized by expanding the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus, but in Taiyuan dialect the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus doesn't observed significant expanding. Furthermore, no obvious differences in syllable duration and intensity between the focused and unfocused condition are discovered in all these dialects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with 2015 Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with 2015 Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSDA.2015.7357863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with 2015 Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSDA.2015.7357863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

通常认为焦点在语篇中具有交际功能,每种语言都有自己的实现焦点的方式。本文比较了济南方言和太原方言的焦点实现。通过考察两种方言在聚焦和非聚焦条件下的平均F0、持续时间和强度的变化,探讨两种方言在聚焦实现上的异同。数据表明,F0是两种方言中与焦点最接近的声学关联。压制后焦点区域的音高范围和保持前焦点音节音高范围不变在所有方言中都存在;同时,济南方言的对焦也是通过扩大所有对焦音节的音高范围来实现的,而太原方言的对焦音节的音高范围没有明显的扩大。此外,所有方言在音节时长和音节强度上都没有发现聚焦和非聚焦状态的明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrastive study of focus phonetic realization between Jinan dialect and Taiyuan dialect
It is usually considered that focus bears communicative function in discourse, each language has its own ways to realize focus. This paper compares the focus realization of Jinan dialect and Taiyuan dialect. It aims to investigate the similarity and difference of focus realization through examining the variations of mean F0, duration and intensity in both focused and unfocused conditions between these two dialects. The data represents that F0 is the closest acoustic correlate with focus in both dialects. Suppressing the pitch range in the post-focus region and leaving the pitch range of the pre-focus syllables unchanged exist in all the dialects; meanwhile, focus in Jinan dialect is also realized by expanding the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus, but in Taiyuan dialect the pitch range of all the syllables on-focus doesn't observed significant expanding. Furthermore, no obvious differences in syllable duration and intensity between the focused and unfocused condition are discovered in all these dialects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信