在运动机能学学士学位中实施客观结构化临床检查(osce)

Sarah-Caroline Poitras, S. Bélanger, P. Corbeil, Andréane Lambert-Roy, Adrien Cantat
{"title":"在运动机能学学士学位中实施客观结构化临床检查(osce)","authors":"Sarah-Caroline Poitras, S. Bélanger, P. Corbeil, Andréane Lambert-Roy, Adrien Cantat","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"For the past four years, the Laval University’s kinesiology bachelor degree has been using an OSCE to assess their students’ clinical competencies. This presentation will describe the format the OSCE and will discuss the quality improvement process implemented following psychometric analysis of the test and its nine stations. The psychometrics qualities were tested using the Cronbach’s alpha, the stations’ difficulty level and discrimination index. An ANOVA has also been realised to ensure that the students’ results of a same station in a different circuit were equivalent regarding the examiners. In the 2018 edition, the psychometrics qualities were under the standards, especially the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. In order to improve the reliability of the test, modifications were made to seven of nine scoring grids. A committee revised each competencies’ component assessed and removed the ambiguous ones. The psychometrics qualities of the revised results improved accordingly. To prepare the 2019 edition, the OSCE committee reviewed the nine stations and adjusted the scoring grids. It also designed three new clinical situations. The psychometrics qualities of the 2019 edition have shown an improvement of the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. It has also demonstrated no significant differences between the circuits’ performance. The appreciation surveys administered following each edition revealed the quality of the support offered to the students, examiners and simulated patients and the authenticity of the clinical situations. We thus consider this OSCE to be a reliable method to assess students’ competencies of our kinesiology program.\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"44 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) IN A KINESIOLOGY BACHELOR DEGREE\",\"authors\":\"Sarah-Caroline Poitras, S. Bélanger, P. Corbeil, Andréane Lambert-Roy, Adrien Cantat\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2022v2end048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"For the past four years, the Laval University’s kinesiology bachelor degree has been using an OSCE to assess their students’ clinical competencies. This presentation will describe the format the OSCE and will discuss the quality improvement process implemented following psychometric analysis of the test and its nine stations. The psychometrics qualities were tested using the Cronbach’s alpha, the stations’ difficulty level and discrimination index. An ANOVA has also been realised to ensure that the students’ results of a same station in a different circuit were equivalent regarding the examiners. In the 2018 edition, the psychometrics qualities were under the standards, especially the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. In order to improve the reliability of the test, modifications were made to seven of nine scoring grids. A committee revised each competencies’ component assessed and removed the ambiguous ones. The psychometrics qualities of the revised results improved accordingly. To prepare the 2019 edition, the OSCE committee reviewed the nine stations and adjusted the scoring grids. It also designed three new clinical situations. The psychometrics qualities of the 2019 edition have shown an improvement of the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. It has also demonstrated no significant differences between the circuits’ performance. The appreciation surveys administered following each edition revealed the quality of the support offered to the students, examiners and simulated patients and the authenticity of the clinical situations. We thus consider this OSCE to be a reliable method to assess students’ competencies of our kinesiology program.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":404891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"volume\":\"44 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“在过去的四年里,拉瓦尔大学的运动学学士学位一直使用欧安组织来评估学生的临床能力。本报告将介绍欧安组织的格式,并将讨论在对测试及其九个站点进行心理测量分析后实施的质量改进过程。采用Cronbach’s alpha、考点难度和歧视指数对心理测量质量进行测试。还实现了方差分析,以确保不同电路中同一站点的学生的结果对于考官来说是相等的。在2018年的版本中,心理测量质量低于标准,特别是Cronbach ' s alpha和车站的歧视指数。为了提高测试的可靠性,对9个计分格中的7个进行了修改。一个委员会修订了所评估的每项能力的组成部分,并删除了模棱两可的部分。修订后结果的心理测量学质量相应提高。为了准备2019年的版本,欧安组织委员会审查了9个站点并调整了计分网格。它还设计了三种新的临床情况。2019年版的心理测量质量显示,克朗巴赫α和电台的歧视指数有所改善。研究还表明,两种电路的性能没有显著差异。每版之后进行的欣赏调查揭示了为学生、考官和模拟病人提供的支持的质量以及临床情况的真实性。因此,我们认为这个欧安组织是一个可靠的方法来评估学生的运动机能学课程的能力。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) IN A KINESIOLOGY BACHELOR DEGREE
"For the past four years, the Laval University’s kinesiology bachelor degree has been using an OSCE to assess their students’ clinical competencies. This presentation will describe the format the OSCE and will discuss the quality improvement process implemented following psychometric analysis of the test and its nine stations. The psychometrics qualities were tested using the Cronbach’s alpha, the stations’ difficulty level and discrimination index. An ANOVA has also been realised to ensure that the students’ results of a same station in a different circuit were equivalent regarding the examiners. In the 2018 edition, the psychometrics qualities were under the standards, especially the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. In order to improve the reliability of the test, modifications were made to seven of nine scoring grids. A committee revised each competencies’ component assessed and removed the ambiguous ones. The psychometrics qualities of the revised results improved accordingly. To prepare the 2019 edition, the OSCE committee reviewed the nine stations and adjusted the scoring grids. It also designed three new clinical situations. The psychometrics qualities of the 2019 edition have shown an improvement of the Cronbach’s alpha and the stations’ discrimination index. It has also demonstrated no significant differences between the circuits’ performance. The appreciation surveys administered following each edition revealed the quality of the support offered to the students, examiners and simulated patients and the authenticity of the clinical situations. We thus consider this OSCE to be a reliable method to assess students’ competencies of our kinesiology program."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信