非利息收入对中国银行业效率的影响

Li Li
{"title":"非利息收入对中国银行业效率的影响","authors":"Li Li","doi":"10.4172/2168-9458.1000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of non-interest income on bank efficiency based on data from China banking sector during the period 1996~2010 by establishing DEA model and Panel-Tobit model. The efficiency levels of China banking sector are estimated by employing traditional DEA model, which only considers loans and investments as the output variables, and alternative DEA model, which considers non-interest income as an additional output variable. The results of parametric and non-parametric univariate tests on the efficiency scores show that there are no significant differences in mean and median efficiency calculated from traditional and alternative DEA models. In other words, the inclusion of non-interest income in output vector does not have a statistically significant influence on the efficiency of China banking sector. Additionally, we normalize each bank’s efficiency score under these two DEA models in order to avoid potential estimation bias due to the fact that the alternative DEA model has one more output variable than the traditional DEA model, and the findings suggest that only a small proportion of banks present an increase in efficiency level with inclusion of non-interest income, while no significant changes are seen on most banks’ efficiency levels. Also, further analysis by establishing Panel-Tobit regression model finds that the relationship between the share of noninterest income to the net operating revenue and the bank efficiency score is not significant, which suggests that the bank efficiency doesn’t increase significantly with the increasing non-interest income share. Furthermore, the bank efficiency also does not present a significant increase with the time. Overall, our findings suggest that the inclusion of non-interest income does not significantly increase the efficiency level of China banking sector.","PeriodicalId":315937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stock & Forex Trading","volume":"33 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Non-interest Income on the Efficiency of China's Banking Sector\",\"authors\":\"Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2168-9458.1000135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of non-interest income on bank efficiency based on data from China banking sector during the period 1996~2010 by establishing DEA model and Panel-Tobit model. The efficiency levels of China banking sector are estimated by employing traditional DEA model, which only considers loans and investments as the output variables, and alternative DEA model, which considers non-interest income as an additional output variable. The results of parametric and non-parametric univariate tests on the efficiency scores show that there are no significant differences in mean and median efficiency calculated from traditional and alternative DEA models. In other words, the inclusion of non-interest income in output vector does not have a statistically significant influence on the efficiency of China banking sector. Additionally, we normalize each bank’s efficiency score under these two DEA models in order to avoid potential estimation bias due to the fact that the alternative DEA model has one more output variable than the traditional DEA model, and the findings suggest that only a small proportion of banks present an increase in efficiency level with inclusion of non-interest income, while no significant changes are seen on most banks’ efficiency levels. Also, further analysis by establishing Panel-Tobit regression model finds that the relationship between the share of noninterest income to the net operating revenue and the bank efficiency score is not significant, which suggests that the bank efficiency doesn’t increase significantly with the increasing non-interest income share. Furthermore, the bank efficiency also does not present a significant increase with the time. Overall, our findings suggest that the inclusion of non-interest income does not significantly increase the efficiency level of China banking sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stock & Forex Trading\",\"volume\":\"33 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stock & Forex Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9458.1000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stock & Forex Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9458.1000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以1996~2010年中国银行业数据为基础,通过建立DEA模型和Panel-Tobit模型,考察了非利息收入对银行效率的影响。本文采用传统的DEA模型(只考虑贷款和投资作为产出变量)和替代DEA模型(将非利息收入作为额外的产出变量)对中国银行业的效率水平进行了估计。效率得分的参数和非参数单变量检验结果表明,传统DEA模型和替代DEA模型计算的平均效率和中位数效率没有显著差异。也就是说,将非利息收入纳入产出向量对中国银行业效率的影响在统计学上并不显著。此外,为了避免由于替代DEA模型比传统DEA模型多一个输出变量而导致的潜在估计偏差,我们对这两种DEA模型下的每家银行的效率得分进行了归一化,结果表明,只有一小部分银行在纳入非利息收入后效率水平有所提高,而大多数银行的效率水平没有显著变化。此外,通过建立Panel-Tobit回归模型进一步分析发现,非利息收入占净营业收入的比重与银行效率得分之间的关系不显著,这表明银行效率并不随着非利息收入比重的增加而显著提高。此外,银行效率也不随时间的推移而显著增加。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,纳入非利息收入并没有显著提高中国银行业的效率水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Non-interest Income on the Efficiency of China's Banking Sector
This paper investigates the impact of non-interest income on bank efficiency based on data from China banking sector during the period 1996~2010 by establishing DEA model and Panel-Tobit model. The efficiency levels of China banking sector are estimated by employing traditional DEA model, which only considers loans and investments as the output variables, and alternative DEA model, which considers non-interest income as an additional output variable. The results of parametric and non-parametric univariate tests on the efficiency scores show that there are no significant differences in mean and median efficiency calculated from traditional and alternative DEA models. In other words, the inclusion of non-interest income in output vector does not have a statistically significant influence on the efficiency of China banking sector. Additionally, we normalize each bank’s efficiency score under these two DEA models in order to avoid potential estimation bias due to the fact that the alternative DEA model has one more output variable than the traditional DEA model, and the findings suggest that only a small proportion of banks present an increase in efficiency level with inclusion of non-interest income, while no significant changes are seen on most banks’ efficiency levels. Also, further analysis by establishing Panel-Tobit regression model finds that the relationship between the share of noninterest income to the net operating revenue and the bank efficiency score is not significant, which suggests that the bank efficiency doesn’t increase significantly with the increasing non-interest income share. Furthermore, the bank efficiency also does not present a significant increase with the time. Overall, our findings suggest that the inclusion of non-interest income does not significantly increase the efficiency level of China banking sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信