前言:童年与社会排斥——南方社会学?

M. Sarmento
{"title":"前言:童年与社会排斥——南方社会学?","authors":"M. Sarmento","doi":"10.4337/9781789901245.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, in Central and Northern Europe, the sociology of childhood has been developing, placing its main focus of analysis on childhood as a generation in contrast to the adult generation.1 It is understandable why this polarity has become a shining principle of this new area of sociology, considering the previous invisibility of childhood and children in the social sciences. However, one of the effects of focusing on intergenerational relations has been the concealment of social differences; the erasure of the effects of class on childhood conceptualization; and the exclusion of issues such as child poverty from mainstream studies in the field. These themes have been confined to subject areas such as social work and social policy. Not long ago, Qvortrup (2009) rejected the ‘temptation of diversity’ to defend the unitary character of childhood as a sociogenerational category and to sustain the focus of sociological analysis on the processes of social constitution of the structural relation between childhood and other generational categories. However, the sociology of childhood developed in the countries of Southern Europe always gave priority to class differences in its approach to childhood. Issues such as child labour, child poverty, public policies and discrimination against children of low social status, ill-treatment, migrant, minority and oppressed children, have been central in this sociological work. In Portugal and Brazil, the focus on the poor child is a structuring characteristic of this Lusophone linguistic variant within the discipline (Sirota, 2012). Considering the universalistic scientific focus in sociology of childhood, the combination of social, cultural and epistemological factors creates variations in knowledge production in countries with linguistic specificities. In this sense, it is possible to speak about a ‘southern’ sociology of childhood, characterized by the particular contribution it makes to the scientific field of childhood studies. The countries from Southern Europe (in particular, Greece and Portugal), far removed from the per capita income indicators of Central and Northern","PeriodicalId":399640,"journal":{"name":"Children's Lives in Southern Europe","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreword: childhood and social exclusion – a sociology of the south?\",\"authors\":\"M. Sarmento\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789901245.00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last two decades, in Central and Northern Europe, the sociology of childhood has been developing, placing its main focus of analysis on childhood as a generation in contrast to the adult generation.1 It is understandable why this polarity has become a shining principle of this new area of sociology, considering the previous invisibility of childhood and children in the social sciences. However, one of the effects of focusing on intergenerational relations has been the concealment of social differences; the erasure of the effects of class on childhood conceptualization; and the exclusion of issues such as child poverty from mainstream studies in the field. These themes have been confined to subject areas such as social work and social policy. Not long ago, Qvortrup (2009) rejected the ‘temptation of diversity’ to defend the unitary character of childhood as a sociogenerational category and to sustain the focus of sociological analysis on the processes of social constitution of the structural relation between childhood and other generational categories. However, the sociology of childhood developed in the countries of Southern Europe always gave priority to class differences in its approach to childhood. Issues such as child labour, child poverty, public policies and discrimination against children of low social status, ill-treatment, migrant, minority and oppressed children, have been central in this sociological work. In Portugal and Brazil, the focus on the poor child is a structuring characteristic of this Lusophone linguistic variant within the discipline (Sirota, 2012). Considering the universalistic scientific focus in sociology of childhood, the combination of social, cultural and epistemological factors creates variations in knowledge production in countries with linguistic specificities. In this sense, it is possible to speak about a ‘southern’ sociology of childhood, characterized by the particular contribution it makes to the scientific field of childhood studies. The countries from Southern Europe (in particular, Greece and Portugal), far removed from the per capita income indicators of Central and Northern\",\"PeriodicalId\":399640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children's Lives in Southern Europe\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children's Lives in Southern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901245.00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children's Lives in Southern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901245.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,在中欧和北欧,儿童社会学一直在发展,将其主要重点放在分析儿童作为一代人与成年一代的对比上考虑到以前在社会科学中童年和儿童的不可见性,这是可以理解的,为什么这种极性已经成为这个社会学新领域的一个闪亮原则。然而,关注代际关系的影响之一是掩盖了社会差异;阶级对儿童概念化影响的消除以及将儿童贫困等问题排除在该领域的主流研究之外。这些主题仅限于社会工作和社会政策等主题领域。不久前,Qvortrup(2009)拒绝了“多样性的诱惑”,捍卫童年作为一个社会代际范畴的单一性,并将社会学分析的重点放在童年与其他代际范畴之间的结构关系的社会构成过程上。然而,南欧国家发展起来的儿童社会学在研究儿童问题时总是优先考虑阶级差异。童工、儿童贫穷、公共政策和对社会地位低的儿童的歧视、虐待、移徙儿童、少数民族儿童和被压迫儿童等问题是这项社会学工作的中心。在葡萄牙和巴西,对贫困儿童的关注是该学科内葡语语言变体的结构特征(Sirota, 2012)。考虑到儿童社会学的普遍科学焦点,社会、文化和认识论因素的结合造成了具有语言特殊性的国家知识生产的差异。从这个意义上说,可以说是一种“南方”的儿童社会学,其特点是它对儿童研究科学领域的特殊贡献。南欧国家(特别是希腊和葡萄牙)与中欧和北欧的人均收入指标相去甚远
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreword: childhood and social exclusion – a sociology of the south?
Over the last two decades, in Central and Northern Europe, the sociology of childhood has been developing, placing its main focus of analysis on childhood as a generation in contrast to the adult generation.1 It is understandable why this polarity has become a shining principle of this new area of sociology, considering the previous invisibility of childhood and children in the social sciences. However, one of the effects of focusing on intergenerational relations has been the concealment of social differences; the erasure of the effects of class on childhood conceptualization; and the exclusion of issues such as child poverty from mainstream studies in the field. These themes have been confined to subject areas such as social work and social policy. Not long ago, Qvortrup (2009) rejected the ‘temptation of diversity’ to defend the unitary character of childhood as a sociogenerational category and to sustain the focus of sociological analysis on the processes of social constitution of the structural relation between childhood and other generational categories. However, the sociology of childhood developed in the countries of Southern Europe always gave priority to class differences in its approach to childhood. Issues such as child labour, child poverty, public policies and discrimination against children of low social status, ill-treatment, migrant, minority and oppressed children, have been central in this sociological work. In Portugal and Brazil, the focus on the poor child is a structuring characteristic of this Lusophone linguistic variant within the discipline (Sirota, 2012). Considering the universalistic scientific focus in sociology of childhood, the combination of social, cultural and epistemological factors creates variations in knowledge production in countries with linguistic specificities. In this sense, it is possible to speak about a ‘southern’ sociology of childhood, characterized by the particular contribution it makes to the scientific field of childhood studies. The countries from Southern Europe (in particular, Greece and Portugal), far removed from the per capita income indicators of Central and Northern
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信