{"title":"股份限制、风险承担和对冲基金业绩","authors":"Juha Joenväärä, Pekka Tolonen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1333520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of share restrictions on the risk-taking and on the performance of hedge funds using the Hedge Fund Research (HFR) database. Share restrictions, in the form of longer lockup as well as notice and redemption periods, provide flexibility for the managers. Our results suggest that this flexibility allows hedge fund managers with lockup provision to take an excess risk, which is not compensated, when performance is measured as a unit of the risk taken by the manager. Specifically, we find that typical hedge funds with a lockup provision deliver 5.6-6.6% (3.8-5.4%) lower Fung and Hsieh (2004) appraisal ratios (Sharpe ratios) compared to their peers without a lockup provision. The results remain consistent even after controlling for various database biases, alternative risk and performance measures, and non-linearities in hedge fund returns.","PeriodicalId":201603,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Share Restrictions, Risk Taking and Hedge Fund Performance\",\"authors\":\"Juha Joenväärä, Pekka Tolonen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1333520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the impact of share restrictions on the risk-taking and on the performance of hedge funds using the Hedge Fund Research (HFR) database. Share restrictions, in the form of longer lockup as well as notice and redemption periods, provide flexibility for the managers. Our results suggest that this flexibility allows hedge fund managers with lockup provision to take an excess risk, which is not compensated, when performance is measured as a unit of the risk taken by the manager. Specifically, we find that typical hedge funds with a lockup provision deliver 5.6-6.6% (3.8-5.4%) lower Fung and Hsieh (2004) appraisal ratios (Sharpe ratios) compared to their peers without a lockup provision. The results remain consistent even after controlling for various database biases, alternative risk and performance measures, and non-linearities in hedge fund returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizations & Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizations & Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1333520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1333520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
本文利用对冲基金研究(hedge Fund Research, HFR)数据库研究了股票限制对对冲基金风险承担和绩效的影响。股票限制以更长的禁售期以及通知和赎回期的形式,为基金经理提供了灵活性。我们的研究结果表明,这种灵活性允许有锁定期条款的对冲基金经理承担额外的风险,当业绩作为经理承担的风险的一个单位来衡量时,这一风险没有得到补偿。具体而言,我们发现有锁定条款的典型对冲基金的评估比率(夏普比率)比没有锁定条款的同行低5.6-6.6%(3.8-5.4%)。即使在控制了各种数据库偏差、替代风险和绩效指标以及对冲基金回报的非线性之后,结果仍然是一致的。
Share Restrictions, Risk Taking and Hedge Fund Performance
This paper examines the impact of share restrictions on the risk-taking and on the performance of hedge funds using the Hedge Fund Research (HFR) database. Share restrictions, in the form of longer lockup as well as notice and redemption periods, provide flexibility for the managers. Our results suggest that this flexibility allows hedge fund managers with lockup provision to take an excess risk, which is not compensated, when performance is measured as a unit of the risk taken by the manager. Specifically, we find that typical hedge funds with a lockup provision deliver 5.6-6.6% (3.8-5.4%) lower Fung and Hsieh (2004) appraisal ratios (Sharpe ratios) compared to their peers without a lockup provision. The results remain consistent even after controlling for various database biases, alternative risk and performance measures, and non-linearities in hedge fund returns.