{"title":"上帝是我们的主体，从不反对我们","authors":"Marc A. Pugliese","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823284603.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marc Pugliese offers a close reading of Śaṅkara’s interpretation of the Kena Upaniṣad and Barth’s reflections on the self-revelation of God (especially in CD 1/1), focusing on the issue of divine subjectivity. He notes that despite their differences, the two texts exhibit strong parallels in their descriptions of ultimate reality as utterly non-objectifiable. Most interesting is Pugliese’s suggestion that the Kena Upaniṣad can help respond to critics of Barth by further developing Barth’s theology of God’s subjectivity in ways that follow from what Barth himself says.","PeriodicalId":446621,"journal":{"name":"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God as Subject and Never Object to Us\",\"authors\":\"Marc A. Pugliese\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823284603.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marc Pugliese offers a close reading of Śaṅkara’s interpretation of the Kena Upaniṣad and Barth’s reflections on the self-revelation of God (especially in CD 1/1), focusing on the issue of divine subjectivity. He notes that despite their differences, the two texts exhibit strong parallels in their descriptions of ultimate reality as utterly non-objectifiable. Most interesting is Pugliese’s suggestion that the Kena Upaniṣad can help respond to critics of Barth by further developing Barth’s theology of God’s subjectivity in ways that follow from what Barth himself says.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284603.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284603.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Marc Pugliese提供了Śaṅkara对Kena的解释Upaniṣad和Barth对上帝自我启示的反思(特别是在CD 1/1中)的仔细阅读，重点关注神圣主体性的问题。他指出，尽管存在差异，但这两篇文章在描述完全不可客观化的终极现实方面表现出强烈的相似之处。最有趣的是Pugliese的建议，Kena Upaniṣad可以帮助回应对巴特的批评，通过进一步发展巴特关于上帝主体性的神学，以巴特自己所说的方式。
Marc Pugliese offers a close reading of Śaṅkara’s interpretation of the Kena Upaniṣad and Barth’s reflections on the self-revelation of God (especially in CD 1/1), focusing on the issue of divine subjectivity. He notes that despite their differences, the two texts exhibit strong parallels in their descriptions of ultimate reality as utterly non-objectifiable. Most interesting is Pugliese’s suggestion that the Kena Upaniṣad can help respond to critics of Barth by further developing Barth’s theology of God’s subjectivity in ways that follow from what Barth himself says.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
