制度的话语心理学

J. Potter
{"title":"制度的话语心理学","authors":"J. Potter","doi":"10.53841/bpsspr.2005.7.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade or so discursive psychology has developed as a distinct\nperspective within social psychology, psychology and social science more generally\n(Edwards, 1997; Edwards & Potter, 1992; Potter & Edwards, 2001). One of the\nthings that differentiates it from other approaches is its conceptualisation of\npsychology itself. Most social psychological takes as at least a central topic an inner\nrepresentation or processing system of some kind. This is true of social cognition\nwork, of social representations research, and of many strands of newer approaches to\nsubjectivity. Inner representations and processes are seen as central to\nunderstanding human action. This paper is not intended to criticise this view; rather\nit will further develop a discursive psychological alternative.","PeriodicalId":278221,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Review","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A discursive psychology of institutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpsspr.2005.7.1.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last decade or so discursive psychology has developed as a distinct\\nperspective within social psychology, psychology and social science more generally\\n(Edwards, 1997; Edwards & Potter, 1992; Potter & Edwards, 2001). One of the\\nthings that differentiates it from other approaches is its conceptualisation of\\npsychology itself. Most social psychological takes as at least a central topic an inner\\nrepresentation or processing system of some kind. This is true of social cognition\\nwork, of social representations research, and of many strands of newer approaches to\\nsubjectivity. Inner representations and processes are seen as central to\\nunderstanding human action. This paper is not intended to criticise this view; rather\\nit will further develop a discursive psychological alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychological Review\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2005.7.1.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2005.7.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在过去十年左右的时间里,话语心理学已经发展成为社会心理学、心理学和更广泛的社会科学中的一个独特视角(Edwards, 1997;Edwards & Potter, 1992;波特和爱德华兹,2001)。它与其他方法的区别之一是它对心理学本身的概念化。大多数社会心理学至少把某种内在表征或处理系统作为一个中心主题。这在社会认知工作、社会表征研究和许多新的主体性研究方法中都是如此。内部表征和过程被视为理解人类行为的核心。本文并不打算批评这种观点;相反,它将进一步发展一种话语心理学替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A discursive psychology of institutions
Over the last decade or so discursive psychology has developed as a distinct perspective within social psychology, psychology and social science more generally (Edwards, 1997; Edwards & Potter, 1992; Potter & Edwards, 2001). One of the things that differentiates it from other approaches is its conceptualisation of psychology itself. Most social psychological takes as at least a central topic an inner representation or processing system of some kind. This is true of social cognition work, of social representations research, and of many strands of newer approaches to subjectivity. Inner representations and processes are seen as central to understanding human action. This paper is not intended to criticise this view; rather it will further develop a discursive psychological alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信