{"title":"塞特和南风之子","authors":"Amar Annus","doi":"10.1163/9789004368088_003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper will combine the data of archaeology, historical inscriptions and literary texts to cast light on the circumstances underwhich the figure Seth in Judaism emerged. There is a linguistic and historical continuity between the Amorite tribe Suteans and the biblical Seth (Šēṯ), son of Adam (Diakonoff 1982: 19). The name Seth originates from the ethnic term for Sutean nomads in Akkadian, alternatively called Shasu/Shosu in Egyptian. The term Sutean is analogous to the term ḫabiru/‘apiru, which was widely used in the secondmillennium Akkadian and Egyptian texts for splinter groups, and continued to be used in the Hebrew Bible, although in a modified meaning (see Na’aman 2005, 252–274). The present paper will argue that the ancient terms for the tribally organized Shasu or Sutean nomads survived in the accounts about Seth and his sons. The Akkadian word šūtu or sūtu denotes both the cardinal direction of the south and a pastoral tribe of southern origin. The Sutean tribes were exemplary enemies of Mesopotamian kings and gods, the southwind had a negative character, e.g. it was the antagonist of the sage in the Adapa myth. I will outline the idea that the account about Seth in Genesis polemically reverses the accounts in cuneiform literature about the Suteans. Both Adapa’s curse of the south wind and the accounts about destruction of Suteans are countered in Gen 4: 25, whereGod grants toAdamanother child Seth in place of Abel. Pieces of historical memory about the Sutean tribes can be found in the Hebrew Bible and elsewhere in the Jewish literature in the stories about Adam’s son Seth and his progeny. It is probable that the Sutean pastoral tribes of Transjordanian origin indeed participated in the formation of the central hill country population during the early Iron Age (Rainey 2001). Secondarily, the accounts about “sons of Seth” became diversified within Jewish tradition itself, when different social groups started to identify themselves as such. There are instances in which “sons of Seth” are portrayed either in a positive or negative way.","PeriodicalId":297137,"journal":{"name":"Mesopotamian Medicine and Magic","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sons of Seth and the South Wind\",\"authors\":\"Amar Annus\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004368088_003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper will combine the data of archaeology, historical inscriptions and literary texts to cast light on the circumstances underwhich the figure Seth in Judaism emerged. There is a linguistic and historical continuity between the Amorite tribe Suteans and the biblical Seth (Šēṯ), son of Adam (Diakonoff 1982: 19). The name Seth originates from the ethnic term for Sutean nomads in Akkadian, alternatively called Shasu/Shosu in Egyptian. The term Sutean is analogous to the term ḫabiru/‘apiru, which was widely used in the secondmillennium Akkadian and Egyptian texts for splinter groups, and continued to be used in the Hebrew Bible, although in a modified meaning (see Na’aman 2005, 252–274). The present paper will argue that the ancient terms for the tribally organized Shasu or Sutean nomads survived in the accounts about Seth and his sons. The Akkadian word šūtu or sūtu denotes both the cardinal direction of the south and a pastoral tribe of southern origin. The Sutean tribes were exemplary enemies of Mesopotamian kings and gods, the southwind had a negative character, e.g. it was the antagonist of the sage in the Adapa myth. I will outline the idea that the account about Seth in Genesis polemically reverses the accounts in cuneiform literature about the Suteans. Both Adapa’s curse of the south wind and the accounts about destruction of Suteans are countered in Gen 4: 25, whereGod grants toAdamanother child Seth in place of Abel. Pieces of historical memory about the Sutean tribes can be found in the Hebrew Bible and elsewhere in the Jewish literature in the stories about Adam’s son Seth and his progeny. It is probable that the Sutean pastoral tribes of Transjordanian origin indeed participated in the formation of the central hill country population during the early Iron Age (Rainey 2001). Secondarily, the accounts about “sons of Seth” became diversified within Jewish tradition itself, when different social groups started to identify themselves as such. There are instances in which “sons of Seth” are portrayed either in a positive or negative way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mesopotamian Medicine and Magic\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mesopotamian Medicine and Magic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368088_003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mesopotamian Medicine and Magic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368088_003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文将结合考古学、历史铭文和文学文本的资料,阐明在犹太教中塞特这个人物出现的情况。在亚摩利人部落苏泰人和圣经中的亚当之子塞特(Šēṯ)之间有语言和历史的连续性(Diakonoff 1982: 19)。赛斯这个名字起源于阿卡德语中对苏泰游牧民族的称呼,或者在埃及语中被称为Shasu/Shosu。Sutean一词类似于ḫabiru/ ' apiru一词,该词在第二个千年的阿卡德语和埃及文本中广泛用于分裂团体,并继续在希伯来圣经中使用,尽管其含义有所修改(见Na ' aman 2005, 252-274)。本文将论证关于部落组织的沙苏或苏泰游牧民族的古老术语在关于塞特和他的儿子们的叙述中幸存下来。阿卡德语单词šūtu或sūtu既表示南方的主要方向,也表示起源于南方的田园部落。苏泰部落是美索不达米亚国王和神的典型敌人,南风具有负面的特征,例如,它是阿达帕神话中圣人的敌人。我将概述创世纪中关于塞特的叙述,与楔形文字中关于苏泰人的叙述截然相反。阿达帕对南风的诅咒和对苏阗人毁灭的描述都在创世记4:25中被反驳,在那里上帝赐给亚当另一个孩子塞特代替亚伯。关于苏泰部落的历史记忆片段可以在希伯来圣经和其他犹太文学中找到,比如亚当的儿子塞特和他的后代的故事。在铁器时代早期,源自外约旦的苏泰游牧部落很可能确实参与了中部山区人口的形成(Rainey 2001)。其次,当不同的社会群体开始认同自己为“塞特之子”时,关于“塞特之子”的说法在犹太传统中变得多样化。在一些例子中,“赛斯之子”要么被描绘成正面的,要么被描绘成负面的。
The present paper will combine the data of archaeology, historical inscriptions and literary texts to cast light on the circumstances underwhich the figure Seth in Judaism emerged. There is a linguistic and historical continuity between the Amorite tribe Suteans and the biblical Seth (Šēṯ), son of Adam (Diakonoff 1982: 19). The name Seth originates from the ethnic term for Sutean nomads in Akkadian, alternatively called Shasu/Shosu in Egyptian. The term Sutean is analogous to the term ḫabiru/‘apiru, which was widely used in the secondmillennium Akkadian and Egyptian texts for splinter groups, and continued to be used in the Hebrew Bible, although in a modified meaning (see Na’aman 2005, 252–274). The present paper will argue that the ancient terms for the tribally organized Shasu or Sutean nomads survived in the accounts about Seth and his sons. The Akkadian word šūtu or sūtu denotes both the cardinal direction of the south and a pastoral tribe of southern origin. The Sutean tribes were exemplary enemies of Mesopotamian kings and gods, the southwind had a negative character, e.g. it was the antagonist of the sage in the Adapa myth. I will outline the idea that the account about Seth in Genesis polemically reverses the accounts in cuneiform literature about the Suteans. Both Adapa’s curse of the south wind and the accounts about destruction of Suteans are countered in Gen 4: 25, whereGod grants toAdamanother child Seth in place of Abel. Pieces of historical memory about the Sutean tribes can be found in the Hebrew Bible and elsewhere in the Jewish literature in the stories about Adam’s son Seth and his progeny. It is probable that the Sutean pastoral tribes of Transjordanian origin indeed participated in the formation of the central hill country population during the early Iron Age (Rainey 2001). Secondarily, the accounts about “sons of Seth” became diversified within Jewish tradition itself, when different social groups started to identify themselves as such. There are instances in which “sons of Seth” are portrayed either in a positive or negative way.