{"title":"电力系统动态特征在线识别分类方法评价","authors":"Tingyan Guo, Jiachen He, Zhen Li, J. Milanović","doi":"10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the use of Decision Tree (DT), Ensemble DT and multiclass Support Vector Machine (SVM) for on-line prediction of post-fault system dynamic signature based on Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) measurements. The performance of these multiclass classification techniques is compared in terms of i) how fast the prediction about generator grouping can be made after the clearance of transient disturbance and ii) the accuracy of prediction. The application of these methods is illustrated on a 16-machine, 68-bus test system. Results indicate that the Ensemble DT method performs the best by achieving accuracy of close to 90% using 10 cycles data of post-disturbance generator rotor angles as predictors and over 90% using 30 cycles data of rotor angles as predictors.","PeriodicalId":155801,"journal":{"name":"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of classification methods for on-line identification of power system dynamic signature\",\"authors\":\"Tingyan Guo, Jiachen He, Zhen Li, J. Milanović\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper investigates the use of Decision Tree (DT), Ensemble DT and multiclass Support Vector Machine (SVM) for on-line prediction of post-fault system dynamic signature based on Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) measurements. The performance of these multiclass classification techniques is compared in terms of i) how fast the prediction about generator grouping can be made after the clearance of transient disturbance and ii) the accuracy of prediction. The application of these methods is illustrated on a 16-machine, 68-bus test system. Results indicate that the Ensemble DT method performs the best by achieving accuracy of close to 90% using 10 cycles data of post-disturbance generator rotor angles as predictors and over 90% using 30 cycles data of rotor angles as predictors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of classification methods for on-line identification of power system dynamic signature
The paper investigates the use of Decision Tree (DT), Ensemble DT and multiclass Support Vector Machine (SVM) for on-line prediction of post-fault system dynamic signature based on Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) measurements. The performance of these multiclass classification techniques is compared in terms of i) how fast the prediction about generator grouping can be made after the clearance of transient disturbance and ii) the accuracy of prediction. The application of these methods is illustrated on a 16-machine, 68-bus test system. Results indicate that the Ensemble DT method performs the best by achieving accuracy of close to 90% using 10 cycles data of post-disturbance generator rotor angles as predictors and over 90% using 30 cycles data of rotor angles as predictors.