寻找邪恶:2018年格鲁吉亚总统选举的情感维度

M. Chitashvili, Davit Machavarian, Otar Sokhadze
{"title":"寻找邪恶:2018年格鲁吉亚总统选举的情感维度","authors":"M. Chitashvili, Davit Machavarian, Otar Sokhadze","doi":"10.36315/2019inpact058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses how employing theoretical elements and interpretive frames of psychoanalytic anthropology, particularly from Lacanian perspective, help to conceptualize and analyze the affective dimensions in elections by creation the image of enemy as evil. Psychoanalytical theoretical vocabulary became the main source to capture affective dimension of politics by analyzing the texts, images and discourse how various emotions are signified in political speech. Election as a conventional public activity involves different political parties declaring their political values and competing to convince the large groups of population to vote for and follow specific discourses in order to get the majority in elections and win by setting parameters through which desire is produced, regulated and channeled (Kolvraa, 2018). The common knowledge of building the electoral discourses involves construction of image of enemy, evil, that has to carry the guilt for the perpetual postponement of utopia (Zizek, 1990), i.e. fulfillment of the emotional pull of certain political ideas. By Lacan human subject is never integrated into the symbolic world of language and traced by feelings of something loss and driven by the desire to recapture the lost enjoyment. By Glynos (2010), Starvakakis (2007) and Zizek (2005) this framework was used to understand the affective dimensions of ideological discourses. “This means that ideological discourses must produce fantasmatic narratives or scenarios which promise a utopian future of full satisfaction” (Kolvraa, 2018). In narratives like fascism, radical nationalism, Stalinism loss of enjoyment is replaced as a “stolen” by the enemy than contributes to maintain expectation of impossible – “a return to the fullness of jouisance in a utopian society” (Kolvraa, 2018). However the question of enjoyment still remains open in terms of affective dimension of political discourse – how it is achieved by the discourses of regaining of lost or defeating the enemy. We are analyzing the concrete presidential elections in Georgia, former soviet and new democratic country as a multidimensional social phenomenon coming from Stalinist and nationalist authoritarian past straggling to establish democratic institutions, laws and regulations, implementing elections as a main source of democratic governance. The case of last presidential elections is discussed as ambiguous model where discourses of enemy is floating form lost to stolen enjoyment of utopian society","PeriodicalId":295945,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IN SEARCH OF EVIL: AFFECTIVE DIMENSIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2018 IN GEORGIA\",\"authors\":\"M. Chitashvili, Davit Machavarian, Otar Sokhadze\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2019inpact058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses how employing theoretical elements and interpretive frames of psychoanalytic anthropology, particularly from Lacanian perspective, help to conceptualize and analyze the affective dimensions in elections by creation the image of enemy as evil. Psychoanalytical theoretical vocabulary became the main source to capture affective dimension of politics by analyzing the texts, images and discourse how various emotions are signified in political speech. Election as a conventional public activity involves different political parties declaring their political values and competing to convince the large groups of population to vote for and follow specific discourses in order to get the majority in elections and win by setting parameters through which desire is produced, regulated and channeled (Kolvraa, 2018). The common knowledge of building the electoral discourses involves construction of image of enemy, evil, that has to carry the guilt for the perpetual postponement of utopia (Zizek, 1990), i.e. fulfillment of the emotional pull of certain political ideas. By Lacan human subject is never integrated into the symbolic world of language and traced by feelings of something loss and driven by the desire to recapture the lost enjoyment. By Glynos (2010), Starvakakis (2007) and Zizek (2005) this framework was used to understand the affective dimensions of ideological discourses. “This means that ideological discourses must produce fantasmatic narratives or scenarios which promise a utopian future of full satisfaction” (Kolvraa, 2018). In narratives like fascism, radical nationalism, Stalinism loss of enjoyment is replaced as a “stolen” by the enemy than contributes to maintain expectation of impossible – “a return to the fullness of jouisance in a utopian society” (Kolvraa, 2018). However the question of enjoyment still remains open in terms of affective dimension of political discourse – how it is achieved by the discourses of regaining of lost or defeating the enemy. We are analyzing the concrete presidential elections in Georgia, former soviet and new democratic country as a multidimensional social phenomenon coming from Stalinist and nationalist authoritarian past straggling to establish democratic institutions, laws and regulations, implementing elections as a main source of democratic governance. The case of last presidential elections is discussed as ambiguous model where discourses of enemy is floating form lost to stolen enjoyment of utopian society\",\"PeriodicalId\":295945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2019inpact058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2019inpact058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了如何运用精神分析人类学的理论元素和解释框架,特别是从拉康的角度,帮助概念化和分析通过创造敌人作为邪恶形象的选举中的情感维度。精神分析理论词汇通过分析文本、图像和话语中各种情感如何在政治话语中被指示,成为捕捉政治情感维度的主要来源。选举作为一项传统的公共活动,涉及不同的政党宣布他们的政治价值观,并竞相说服大批人口投票并遵循特定的话语,以便在选举中获得多数席位,并通过设定产生、调节和引导欲望的参数来获胜(Kolvraa, 2018)。建构选举话语的共识涉及到对敌人、邪恶形象的建构,这种建构必须背负乌托邦的永久推迟的罪责(齐泽克,1990),即实现某种政治理念的情感拉扯。在拉康看来,人的主体从来没有被整合到语言的象征世界中,没有被某种失落的感觉所追踪,也没有被重新获得失去的享受的欲望所驱动。Glynos(2010)、Starvakakis(2007)和Zizek(2005)使用这一框架来理解意识形态话语的情感维度。“这意味着意识形态话语必须产生幻想的叙事或场景,承诺一个完全满足的乌托邦未来”(Kolvraa, 2018)。在法西斯主义、激进民族主义、斯大林主义等叙事中,享受的丧失被敌人“偷走”,而不是维持对不可能的期望——“在乌托邦社会中回归充分的快乐”(Kolvraa, 2018)。然而,就政治话语的情感层面而言,享受的问题仍然是开放的- -如何通过收复失地或击败敌人的话语来实现享受。我们正在分析格鲁吉亚这个前苏联和新民主国家的具体总统选举,作为一个多维度的社会现象,它来自斯大林主义和民族主义专制的过去,努力建立民主制度、法律和法规,将选举作为民主治理的主要来源。最后一次总统选举的案例是作为一个模糊的模型来讨论的,在这个模型中,敌人的话语漂浮在乌托邦社会的被盗享受中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IN SEARCH OF EVIL: AFFECTIVE DIMENSIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2018 IN GEORGIA
The paper discusses how employing theoretical elements and interpretive frames of psychoanalytic anthropology, particularly from Lacanian perspective, help to conceptualize and analyze the affective dimensions in elections by creation the image of enemy as evil. Psychoanalytical theoretical vocabulary became the main source to capture affective dimension of politics by analyzing the texts, images and discourse how various emotions are signified in political speech. Election as a conventional public activity involves different political parties declaring their political values and competing to convince the large groups of population to vote for and follow specific discourses in order to get the majority in elections and win by setting parameters through which desire is produced, regulated and channeled (Kolvraa, 2018). The common knowledge of building the electoral discourses involves construction of image of enemy, evil, that has to carry the guilt for the perpetual postponement of utopia (Zizek, 1990), i.e. fulfillment of the emotional pull of certain political ideas. By Lacan human subject is never integrated into the symbolic world of language and traced by feelings of something loss and driven by the desire to recapture the lost enjoyment. By Glynos (2010), Starvakakis (2007) and Zizek (2005) this framework was used to understand the affective dimensions of ideological discourses. “This means that ideological discourses must produce fantasmatic narratives or scenarios which promise a utopian future of full satisfaction” (Kolvraa, 2018). In narratives like fascism, radical nationalism, Stalinism loss of enjoyment is replaced as a “stolen” by the enemy than contributes to maintain expectation of impossible – “a return to the fullness of jouisance in a utopian society” (Kolvraa, 2018). However the question of enjoyment still remains open in terms of affective dimension of political discourse – how it is achieved by the discourses of regaining of lost or defeating the enemy. We are analyzing the concrete presidential elections in Georgia, former soviet and new democratic country as a multidimensional social phenomenon coming from Stalinist and nationalist authoritarian past straggling to establish democratic institutions, laws and regulations, implementing elections as a main source of democratic governance. The case of last presidential elections is discussed as ambiguous model where discourses of enemy is floating form lost to stolen enjoyment of utopian society
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信