欧洲增值税对固定机构的优惠待遇

Rasa Mikutienė
{"title":"欧洲增值税对固定机构的优惠待遇","authors":"Rasa Mikutienė","doi":"10.5235/20488432.3.3.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fixed establishment concept is highly important in supplies of services in European VAT as it determines the country of taxation and applicability of reverse charge. Irrespective of its relevance, the concept itself lacks clarity. Because of this, on the one hand, in many Member States it is vaguely applied in practice. On the other hand, the lack of clarity allows the concept to be misused in seeking various tax benefits. In the light of this, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to discuss the preferred treatment of the fixed establishment stemming from the interpretation of the current legislative provisions and practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and second, to briefly touch upon the measures for mitigation of the negative effects relating to misuse of the fixed establishment concept.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The preferred treatment of the fixed establishment in European VAT\",\"authors\":\"Rasa Mikutienė\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.3.3.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fixed establishment concept is highly important in supplies of services in European VAT as it determines the country of taxation and applicability of reverse charge. Irrespective of its relevance, the concept itself lacks clarity. Because of this, on the one hand, in many Member States it is vaguely applied in practice. On the other hand, the lack of clarity allows the concept to be misused in seeking various tax benefits. In the light of this, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to discuss the preferred treatment of the fixed establishment stemming from the interpretation of the current legislative provisions and practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and second, to briefly touch upon the measures for mitigation of the negative effects relating to misuse of the fixed establishment concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.3.166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.3.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固定设置概念在欧洲增值税服务供给中具有重要意义,它决定了征税国和反向收费的适用性。不管其相关性如何,这个概念本身缺乏明确性。因此,一方面,在许多会员国中,它在实践中得到模糊的适用。另一方面,由于缺乏明确性,这一概念可能会被滥用于寻求各种税收优惠。有鉴于此,本文的目的有两方面:首先,讨论从对欧洲联盟法院现行立法规定和实践的解释中产生的对固定机构的优先待遇,其次,简要介绍减轻与滥用固定机构概念有关的负面影响的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The preferred treatment of the fixed establishment in European VAT
The fixed establishment concept is highly important in supplies of services in European VAT as it determines the country of taxation and applicability of reverse charge. Irrespective of its relevance, the concept itself lacks clarity. Because of this, on the one hand, in many Member States it is vaguely applied in practice. On the other hand, the lack of clarity allows the concept to be misused in seeking various tax benefits. In the light of this, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to discuss the preferred treatment of the fixed establishment stemming from the interpretation of the current legislative provisions and practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and second, to briefly touch upon the measures for mitigation of the negative effects relating to misuse of the fixed establishment concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信