Valéria Tóth
{"title":"Szempontok Anonymus gesztájának helyesírás-történeti feldolgozásához","authors":"Valéria Tóth","doi":"10.30790/mnyj/2021/01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considerations for the Study of Anonymous’ Gesta From the Perspective of Historical Orthography Anonymous’ Gesta Hungarorum has been studied by both historians and linguists for a long time. Both disciplines have produced an extensive set of scholarly publications relying on a great variety of approaches that study the gesta and its mysterious author. I examine the Hungarian remnants (and Latin language elements of Hungarian relevance) of the gesta from the perspective of historical linguistics. In this paper I focus on the aspect of historical orthography more specifically. In my study I start out from the dating of the linguistic record at the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries which is claimed to be most probable by linguists and it facilitates my work that there are several important linguistic records available from this age that are contemporaries of the gesta and which are clearly authentic and include abundant Hungarian language data. The certificate of confirmation of crusaders of Székesfehérvár from 1193 and the Tihany Survey of 1211 are the primary sources in this respect but the historical-orthographic features of the Funeral Sermon and Prayer may also be used in the comparison. Although the genre differences between charters and the narrative historical work obviously result in a different source value in terms of legal authenticity and thus also “onomastic authenticity”, research in historical linguistics in the broader sense of the term is only slightly influenced by this circumstance (or not at all). Meanwhile, I also compare the orthography in Anonymous’ gesta with the general orthographic attributes of the era(s) that are seen as possible dates for the creation of the gesta (around 1217 and in the 1160s-70s) so as to provide additional linguistic arguments for one or the other possible date. After the articulation of the findings of my research, I finally formulate general lessons learned that are related to the source value of different genres of linguistic records (including gestas) from the Árpád Era in terms of historical orthography, while also shedding light on certain details of contemporary written culture.","PeriodicalId":380088,"journal":{"name":"Magyar Nyelvjárások","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magyar Nyelvjárások","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30790/mnyj/2021/01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从历史正字法的角度研究《佚名语意》的思考历史学家和语言学家对《佚名语意》进行了长期的研究。这两个学科都产生了一套广泛的学术出版物,依靠各种各样的方法来研究gesta及其神秘的作者。我从历史语言学的角度考察了gesta的匈牙利残余(和匈牙利相关的拉丁语言元素)。在本文中,我更具体地关注历史正字法方面。在我的研究中,我从12和13世纪之交的语言记录的年代开始,语言学家认为这是最有可能的,这有助于我的工作,因为有几个重要的语言记录来自这个时代,与gesta同时代,它们显然是真实的,包括丰富的匈牙利语言数据。1193年Székesfehérvár的十字军确认书和1211年的提哈尼调查是这方面的主要来源,但《葬礼布道和祈祷》的历史正字法特征也可以用于比较。尽管宪章与叙事性历史作品的体裁差异明显导致其在法律真实性方面的来源价值不同,从而也导致了“本体真实性”的不同,但广义上的历史语言学研究仅受到这种情况的轻微影响(或根本不受影响)。与此同时,我也将《佚名的gesta》中的正字法与被视为可能的gesta创建日期的时代(大约1217年和1160 -70年代)的一般正字法属性进行了比较,以便为其中一个或另一个可能的日期提供额外的语言学论据。在阐述了我的研究结果之后,我最终制定了与Árpád时代不同类型的语言记录(包括gestas)在历史正字法方面的来源价值相关的一般经验教训,同时也揭示了当代书面文化的某些细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Szempontok Anonymus gesztájának helyesírás-történeti feldolgozásához
Considerations for the Study of Anonymous’ Gesta From the Perspective of Historical Orthography Anonymous’ Gesta Hungarorum has been studied by both historians and linguists for a long time. Both disciplines have produced an extensive set of scholarly publications relying on a great variety of approaches that study the gesta and its mysterious author. I examine the Hungarian remnants (and Latin language elements of Hungarian relevance) of the gesta from the perspective of historical linguistics. In this paper I focus on the aspect of historical orthography more specifically. In my study I start out from the dating of the linguistic record at the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries which is claimed to be most probable by linguists and it facilitates my work that there are several important linguistic records available from this age that are contemporaries of the gesta and which are clearly authentic and include abundant Hungarian language data. The certificate of confirmation of crusaders of Székesfehérvár from 1193 and the Tihany Survey of 1211 are the primary sources in this respect but the historical-orthographic features of the Funeral Sermon and Prayer may also be used in the comparison. Although the genre differences between charters and the narrative historical work obviously result in a different source value in terms of legal authenticity and thus also “onomastic authenticity”, research in historical linguistics in the broader sense of the term is only slightly influenced by this circumstance (or not at all). Meanwhile, I also compare the orthography in Anonymous’ gesta with the general orthographic attributes of the era(s) that are seen as possible dates for the creation of the gesta (around 1217 and in the 1160s-70s) so as to provide additional linguistic arguments for one or the other possible date. After the articulation of the findings of my research, I finally formulate general lessons learned that are related to the source value of different genres of linguistic records (including gestas) from the Árpád Era in terms of historical orthography, while also shedding light on certain details of contemporary written culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信