M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg
{"title":"具有拜占庭故障和小系统同步的一致性","authors":"M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2006.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely","PeriodicalId":228470,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus with Byzantine Failures and Little System Synchrony\",\"authors\":\"M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN.2006.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely\",\"PeriodicalId\":228470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2006.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2006.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consensus with Byzantine Failures and Little System Synchrony
We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely