具有拜占庭故障和小系统同步的一致性

M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg
{"title":"具有拜占庭故障和小系统同步的一致性","authors":"M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2006.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely","PeriodicalId":228470,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus with Byzantine Failures and Little System Synchrony\",\"authors\":\"M. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, S. Toueg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN.2006.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely\",\"PeriodicalId\":228470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2006.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2006.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

我们研究了一个消息传递系统中的一致性,在这个系统中,只有n2个链路中的某些链路表现出一定的同步。这个问题以前是针对进程崩溃的系统研究的;我们现在考虑拜占庭式的失败。我们表明,共识可以在一个系统中得到解决,其中至少有一个无故障的过程,其链接最终是及时的;所有其他链接都可以任意慢。我们还表明,就问题的可解决性而言,这样的系统严格弱于所有环节最终都是及时的系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus with Byzantine Failures and Little System Synchrony
We study consensus in a message-passing system where only some of the n2 links exhibit some synchrony. This problem was previously studied for systems with process crashes; we now consider Byzantine failures. We show that consensus can be solved in a system where there is at least one non-faulty process whose links are eventually timely; all other links can be arbitrarily slow. We also show that, in terms of problem solvability, such a system is strictly weaker than one where all links are eventually timely
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信