书评:绘制人类与帝国:冒险地理学。理查德·菲利普斯著。伦敦,劳特利奇出版社,1997。8 + 208页,£45.00,布;£14.99,纸。ISBN 0 415 13771 3,布;0 415 13772 1,论文

S. Mills
{"title":"书评:绘制人类与帝国:冒险地理学。理查德·菲利普斯著。伦敦,劳特利奇出版社,1997。8 + 208页,£45.00,布;£14.99,纸。ISBN 0 415 13771 3,布;0 415 13772 1,论文","authors":"S. Mills","doi":"10.1177/147447409800500209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary","PeriodicalId":199648,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","volume":"128 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : Mapping men and empire: a geography of adventure. By Richard Phillips. London, Routledge. 1997. viii + 208 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13771 3, cloth; 0 415 13772 1, paper\",\"authors\":\"S. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/147447409800500209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary\",\"PeriodicalId\":199648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"volume\":\"128 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409800500209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409800500209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铰接。在结论中,呼吁对现代性进行“重新推理”,不是作为一种市场主导型的西方模式,而是作为一种混合的、更解放的过程,在一个不那么全球化的空间中使用科学和本土技术知识。虽然编辑们很清楚,解放生态学主要是作为一种批判(第262页)来阐述的,但一些撰稿人更强烈地认为,通过社会运动或基层争论,向不同的现代性的转变更接近现实。其次,将公民社会作为有意义的发展场所的关注建立在对新发展主义民粹主义的批判之上,以一些“农民优先”和生态女权主义的方法为例。环境想象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Reviews : Mapping men and empire: a geography of adventure. By Richard Phillips. London, Routledge. 1997. viii + 208 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13771 3, cloth; 0 415 13772 1, paper
articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信