{"title":"书评:绘制人类与帝国:冒险地理学。理查德·菲利普斯著。伦敦,劳特利奇出版社,1997。8 + 208页,£45.00,布;£14.99,纸。ISBN 0 415 13771 3,布;0 415 13772 1,论文","authors":"S. Mills","doi":"10.1177/147447409800500209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary","PeriodicalId":199648,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","volume":"128 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : Mapping men and empire: a geography of adventure. By Richard Phillips. London, Routledge. 1997. viii + 208 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13771 3, cloth; 0 415 13772 1, paper\",\"authors\":\"S. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/147447409800500209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary\",\"PeriodicalId\":199648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"volume\":\"128 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409800500209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409800500209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Book Reviews : Mapping men and empire: a geography of adventure. By Richard Phillips. London, Routledge. 1997. viii + 208 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13771 3, cloth; 0 415 13772 1, paper
articulated. In the conclusions, a call is made for a ’re-reasoning’ of modernity, articulated not as a market-imperative Western model but as a hybrid and more emancipatory process, using science and indigenous technical knowledge in a less than global space. While the editors are clear that liberation ecology is articulated primarily as a critique (p. 262), some contributors feel more strongly that the move to a different modernity is closer to reality, via social movements or grass-roots contestations. Second, a focus on civil society as the site for meaningful development is founded upon a critique of new developmentalist populism, exemplified by some ’farmer-first’ and ecofeminist approaches. The environmental imaginary