使用双反射镜碎石机增加对石头的伤害,但不增加对细胞的伤害

D. Sokolov, M. Bailey, F. Pulvermakher, L. Crum
{"title":"使用双反射镜碎石机增加对石头的伤害,但不增加对细胞的伤害","authors":"D. Sokolov, M. Bailey, F. Pulvermakher, L. Crum","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a commonly used clinical treatment to comminute kidney stones into tiny fragments that can be expelled through a patient's urinary tract. Cavitation, the violent growth and collapse of microscopic bubbles, may be an important mechanism in both stone fragmentation and renal tissue damage during ESWL. In water, a conventional lithotripter generates a cavitation field in a cylindrical volume, /spl sim/1 cm wide/spl times/10 cm long. A dual-reflector lithotripter, consisting of two identical spark-gap lithotripters facing each other and firing simultaneously, creates a more localized cavitation field, /spl sim/3 cm wide/spl times/5 cm long. Stone breakage at the focus, and hemolysis, 2-cm from the focus, were assessed using both conventional lithotripsy (CL) and dual-reflector lithotripsy (DRL). Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 17.3/spl plusmn/3.9 at 18 kV, 5.3/spl plusmn/2.8 at 15 kV and 3/spl plusmn/1.7 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 3.5/spl plusmn/1.9 at 18 kV, 1.6/spl plusmn/0.8 and at 15 kV, and 1.7/spl plusmn/1.1 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, values for hemolysis were 8.1/spl plusmn/2.3% at 18 kV and 4.9/spl plusmn/1.1% at 15 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, values for hemolysis were 10.9/spl plusmn/3.4% at 18 kV and 7.8/spl plusmn/2.5% at 15 kV. These data demonstrate that, in vitro, DRL results in enhanced stone comminution at the focus and decreased damage to red blood cells a short distance from the focus.","PeriodicalId":350384,"journal":{"name":"2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased damage to stones without increased damage to cells with a dual-reflector lithotripter\",\"authors\":\"D. Sokolov, M. Bailey, F. Pulvermakher, L. Crum\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a commonly used clinical treatment to comminute kidney stones into tiny fragments that can be expelled through a patient's urinary tract. Cavitation, the violent growth and collapse of microscopic bubbles, may be an important mechanism in both stone fragmentation and renal tissue damage during ESWL. In water, a conventional lithotripter generates a cavitation field in a cylindrical volume, /spl sim/1 cm wide/spl times/10 cm long. A dual-reflector lithotripter, consisting of two identical spark-gap lithotripters facing each other and firing simultaneously, creates a more localized cavitation field, /spl sim/3 cm wide/spl times/5 cm long. Stone breakage at the focus, and hemolysis, 2-cm from the focus, were assessed using both conventional lithotripsy (CL) and dual-reflector lithotripsy (DRL). Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 17.3/spl plusmn/3.9 at 18 kV, 5.3/spl plusmn/2.8 at 15 kV and 3/spl plusmn/1.7 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 3.5/spl plusmn/1.9 at 18 kV, 1.6/spl plusmn/0.8 and at 15 kV, and 1.7/spl plusmn/1.1 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, values for hemolysis were 8.1/spl plusmn/2.3% at 18 kV and 4.9/spl plusmn/1.1% at 15 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, values for hemolysis were 10.9/spl plusmn/3.4% at 18 kV and 7.8/spl plusmn/2.5% at 15 kV. These data demonstrate that, in vitro, DRL results in enhanced stone comminution at the focus and decreased damage to red blood cells a short distance from the focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)是一种常用的临床治疗方法,可以将肾结石粉碎成微小的碎片,并通过患者的尿路排出体外。空化,即微观气泡的剧烈生长和破裂,可能是体外冲击波碎石过程中结石碎裂和肾组织损伤的重要机制。在水中,传统的碎石机在圆柱形体积中产生空化场,/spl sim/1厘米宽/spl乘以/10厘米长。双反射镜碎石机由两个相同的火花隙碎石机相互面对并同时发射组成,可产生更局部化的空化场,/spl sim/3厘米宽/spl次/5厘米长。采用常规碎石(CL)和双反射镜碎石(DRL)评估病灶处结石破裂和距病灶2cm处溶血情况。在100次DRL照射后,岩石碎片>1.5 mm的数量在18 kV时为17.3/spl plusmn/3.9,在15 kV时为5.3/spl plusmn/2.8,在12 kV时为3/spl plusmn/1.7。暴露200次CL后,石屑>1.5 mm在18 kV时为3.5/spl plusmn/1.9,在15 kV时为1.6/spl plusmn/0.8,在12 kV时为1.7/spl plusmn/1.1。暴露于100针DRL后,溶血值在18 kV时为8.1/spl plusmn/2.3%,在15 kV时为4.9/spl plusmn/1.1%。暴露于200针CL后,溶血值在18 kV时为10.9/spl plusmn/3.4%,在15 kV时为7.8/spl plusmn/2.5%。这些数据表明,在体外,DRL可增强病灶处的结石粉碎,并减少离病灶近距离的红细胞损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increased damage to stones without increased damage to cells with a dual-reflector lithotripter
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a commonly used clinical treatment to comminute kidney stones into tiny fragments that can be expelled through a patient's urinary tract. Cavitation, the violent growth and collapse of microscopic bubbles, may be an important mechanism in both stone fragmentation and renal tissue damage during ESWL. In water, a conventional lithotripter generates a cavitation field in a cylindrical volume, /spl sim/1 cm wide/spl times/10 cm long. A dual-reflector lithotripter, consisting of two identical spark-gap lithotripters facing each other and firing simultaneously, creates a more localized cavitation field, /spl sim/3 cm wide/spl times/5 cm long. Stone breakage at the focus, and hemolysis, 2-cm from the focus, were assessed using both conventional lithotripsy (CL) and dual-reflector lithotripsy (DRL). Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 17.3/spl plusmn/3.9 at 18 kV, 5.3/spl plusmn/2.8 at 15 kV and 3/spl plusmn/1.7 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, the number of stone fragments >1.5 mm were 3.5/spl plusmn/1.9 at 18 kV, 1.6/spl plusmn/0.8 and at 15 kV, and 1.7/spl plusmn/1.1 at 12 kV. Following exposure to 100 shots of DRL, values for hemolysis were 8.1/spl plusmn/2.3% at 18 kV and 4.9/spl plusmn/1.1% at 15 kV. Following exposure to 200 shots of CL, values for hemolysis were 10.9/spl plusmn/3.4% at 18 kV and 7.8/spl plusmn/2.5% at 15 kV. These data demonstrate that, in vitro, DRL results in enhanced stone comminution at the focus and decreased damage to red blood cells a short distance from the focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信