{"title":"2003年养老金改革的合宪性:CCJC和STF如何决定?","authors":"Ana Luiza Arruda","doi":"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.315-332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to analyze how the constitutionality control of the text of constitutional amendment proposal no40 of 2003, and its resulting constitutional amendment no 41 of 2003, took place. For that, the manifestations of the Constitution and Justice Committee of the Chamber of Deputies (CCJC) regarding the normative proposal were studied, in addition to the direct constitutionality actions (ADIs) in the Supreme Federal Court (STF) that dealt with the Constitutional Amendment in question. As a result, I observed that the subjects brought by the CCJC were not the same that STF later worked on in its constitutionality analysis. The conclusion is that the preventive and subsequent control of constitutionality behave as similar and important veto points for the resolution of unconstitutional matters.","PeriodicalId":299944,"journal":{"name":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","volume":"60 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DA REFORMA DA PREVIDÊNCIA DE 2003: COMO DECIDIRAM A CCJC E O STF?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Luiza Arruda\",\"doi\":\"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.315-332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper intends to analyze how the constitutionality control of the text of constitutional amendment proposal no40 of 2003, and its resulting constitutional amendment no 41 of 2003, took place. For that, the manifestations of the Constitution and Justice Committee of the Chamber of Deputies (CCJC) regarding the normative proposal were studied, in addition to the direct constitutionality actions (ADIs) in the Supreme Federal Court (STF) that dealt with the Constitutional Amendment in question. As a result, I observed that the subjects brought by the CCJC were not the same that STF later worked on in its constitutionality analysis. The conclusion is that the preventive and subsequent control of constitutionality behave as similar and important veto points for the resolution of unconstitutional matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"volume\":\"60 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.315-332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.315-332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DA REFORMA DA PREVIDÊNCIA DE 2003: COMO DECIDIRAM A CCJC E O STF?
This paper intends to analyze how the constitutionality control of the text of constitutional amendment proposal no40 of 2003, and its resulting constitutional amendment no 41 of 2003, took place. For that, the manifestations of the Constitution and Justice Committee of the Chamber of Deputies (CCJC) regarding the normative proposal were studied, in addition to the direct constitutionality actions (ADIs) in the Supreme Federal Court (STF) that dealt with the Constitutional Amendment in question. As a result, I observed that the subjects brought by the CCJC were not the same that STF later worked on in its constitutionality analysis. The conclusion is that the preventive and subsequent control of constitutionality behave as similar and important veto points for the resolution of unconstitutional matters.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
