基于M-AHP/E-TOPSIS的异构网络混合网络选择策略

M. Lahby, L. Cherkaoui, A. Adib
{"title":"基于M-AHP/E-TOPSIS的异构网络混合网络选择策略","authors":"M. Lahby, L. Cherkaoui, A. Adib","doi":"10.1109/SITA.2013.6560784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most challenging problem in the heterogeneous wireless networks is ensuring seamless network selection. For that reason, a large variety of algorithms based on multi attribute decision making (MADM) have been proposed to deal with this issue. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) represent two MADM methods which are exhaustively used in the literature to cope with the network selection problem. However both of these methods still suffer from the ranking abnormality and the number of handoffs. Thus, we aim to propose a hybrid network selection strategy based multiple analytic hierarchy process (M-AHP) and the enhanced technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (E-TOPSIS). The M-AHP method represents an extension of AHP which is used to weigh each criterion. While the E-TOPSIS method represents an extension of TOPSIS which is used to rank the alternatives. Simulation results demonstrate that our hybrid strategy for network selection can dealing with the limitations of MADM methods.","PeriodicalId":145244,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid network selection strategy by using M-AHP/E-TOPSIS for heterogeneous networks\",\"authors\":\"M. Lahby, L. Cherkaoui, A. Adib\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SITA.2013.6560784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most challenging problem in the heterogeneous wireless networks is ensuring seamless network selection. For that reason, a large variety of algorithms based on multi attribute decision making (MADM) have been proposed to deal with this issue. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) represent two MADM methods which are exhaustively used in the literature to cope with the network selection problem. However both of these methods still suffer from the ranking abnormality and the number of handoffs. Thus, we aim to propose a hybrid network selection strategy based multiple analytic hierarchy process (M-AHP) and the enhanced technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (E-TOPSIS). The M-AHP method represents an extension of AHP which is used to weigh each criterion. While the E-TOPSIS method represents an extension of TOPSIS which is used to rank the alternatives. Simulation results demonstrate that our hybrid strategy for network selection can dealing with the limitations of MADM methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA.2013.6560784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA.2013.6560784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

异构无线网络中最具挑战性的问题是如何保证网络的无缝选择。为此,人们提出了多种基于多属性决策(MADM)的算法来解决这个问题。层次分析法(AHP)和理想解相似性排序偏好法(TOPSIS)是文献中广泛使用的两种MADM方法,用于解决网络选择问题。但这两种方法都存在排序异常和切换次数过多的问题。因此,我们的目标是提出一种基于多重层次分析法(M-AHP)的混合网络选择策略和基于与理想解相似度的增强排序偏好技术(E-TOPSIS)。M-AHP法是AHP法的一种扩展,用于对各指标进行加权。而E-TOPSIS方法代表了TOPSIS的扩展,用于对备选方案进行排名。仿真结果表明,本文提出的混合网络选择策略能够克服MADM方法的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid network selection strategy by using M-AHP/E-TOPSIS for heterogeneous networks
The most challenging problem in the heterogeneous wireless networks is ensuring seamless network selection. For that reason, a large variety of algorithms based on multi attribute decision making (MADM) have been proposed to deal with this issue. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) represent two MADM methods which are exhaustively used in the literature to cope with the network selection problem. However both of these methods still suffer from the ranking abnormality and the number of handoffs. Thus, we aim to propose a hybrid network selection strategy based multiple analytic hierarchy process (M-AHP) and the enhanced technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (E-TOPSIS). The M-AHP method represents an extension of AHP which is used to weigh each criterion. While the E-TOPSIS method represents an extension of TOPSIS which is used to rank the alternatives. Simulation results demonstrate that our hybrid strategy for network selection can dealing with the limitations of MADM methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信