互联网与人权:访问、关闭和监视

E. Sutherland
{"title":"互联网与人权:访问、关闭和监视","authors":"E. Sutherland","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3203883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A C21st bill of rights needs to address Internet-related issues such as collection and dissemination of personal data, lawful interception, provision of access, and government-enforced shutdowns. However, the uncertain nature of Internet access means firstly that it ought not to be a right, and secondly that institutions and practices need to be designed to benefit from the Internet, to be secure from any threats and to be able to be transformed as technologies change. These complex and evolving challenges call for institutional reforms to support enforcement of existing rights of freedom of expression, privacy and safety, combined with good governance and the rule of law in a digital age. In particular, it requires independent data protection agencies that can share challenges and experiences with their counterparts and which can publicise data breaches and emerging issues. It requires openness, with disclosure of governmental and regulatory activities (e.g., impact and threat assessments), with judicial appeals against decisions and parliamentary oversight of ministers and agencies. Transparency will not be enough to stop autocratic states from shutting down parts of the Internet, when faced with real or imagined opponents, such governments seem able to ignore international protests. Much greater transparency is necessary on national security and the way it used to curtail rights to privacy and safety, and the practice of intrusive surveillance. Good governance at national level can be improved and supported by international cooperation (e.g., peer review, threat assessment, and training).","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Internet and Human Rights: Access, Shutdowns, and Surveillance\",\"authors\":\"E. Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3203883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A C21st bill of rights needs to address Internet-related issues such as collection and dissemination of personal data, lawful interception, provision of access, and government-enforced shutdowns. However, the uncertain nature of Internet access means firstly that it ought not to be a right, and secondly that institutions and practices need to be designed to benefit from the Internet, to be secure from any threats and to be able to be transformed as technologies change. These complex and evolving challenges call for institutional reforms to support enforcement of existing rights of freedom of expression, privacy and safety, combined with good governance and the rule of law in a digital age. In particular, it requires independent data protection agencies that can share challenges and experiences with their counterparts and which can publicise data breaches and emerging issues. It requires openness, with disclosure of governmental and regulatory activities (e.g., impact and threat assessments), with judicial appeals against decisions and parliamentary oversight of ministers and agencies. Transparency will not be enough to stop autocratic states from shutting down parts of the Internet, when faced with real or imagined opponents, such governments seem able to ignore international protests. Much greater transparency is necessary on national security and the way it used to curtail rights to privacy and safety, and the practice of intrusive surveillance. Good governance at national level can be improved and supported by international cooperation (e.g., peer review, threat assessment, and training).\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3203883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3203883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪的权利法案需要解决与互联网有关的问题,如收集和传播个人数据、合法拦截、提供访问和政府强制关闭。然而,互联网接入的不确定性首先意味着它不应该是一项权利,其次,机构和做法的设计需要从互联网中受益,确保不受任何威胁,并能够随着技术的变化而转变。这些复杂和不断演变的挑战要求进行体制改革,以支持落实现有的言论自由、隐私和安全权利,同时在数字时代实行善治和法治。特别是,它需要独立的数据保护机构,这些机构可以与同行分享挑战和经验,并可以公布数据泄露和新出现的问题。它要求公开,公开政府和管理活动(例如影响和威胁评估),对决定提出司法上诉,并要求议会对部长和机构进行监督。透明度不足以阻止专制国家关闭部分互联网,当面对真实或想象的对手时,这些政府似乎能够忽视国际抗议。在国家安全问题上,以及它用来限制隐私权和安全权利的方式,以及侵入式监控的做法,有必要提高透明度。国际合作(如同行审查、威胁评估和培训)可以改善和支持国家一级的善治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Internet and Human Rights: Access, Shutdowns, and Surveillance
A C21st bill of rights needs to address Internet-related issues such as collection and dissemination of personal data, lawful interception, provision of access, and government-enforced shutdowns. However, the uncertain nature of Internet access means firstly that it ought not to be a right, and secondly that institutions and practices need to be designed to benefit from the Internet, to be secure from any threats and to be able to be transformed as technologies change. These complex and evolving challenges call for institutional reforms to support enforcement of existing rights of freedom of expression, privacy and safety, combined with good governance and the rule of law in a digital age. In particular, it requires independent data protection agencies that can share challenges and experiences with their counterparts and which can publicise data breaches and emerging issues. It requires openness, with disclosure of governmental and regulatory activities (e.g., impact and threat assessments), with judicial appeals against decisions and parliamentary oversight of ministers and agencies. Transparency will not be enough to stop autocratic states from shutting down parts of the Internet, when faced with real or imagined opponents, such governments seem able to ignore international protests. Much greater transparency is necessary on national security and the way it used to curtail rights to privacy and safety, and the practice of intrusive surveillance. Good governance at national level can be improved and supported by international cooperation (e.g., peer review, threat assessment, and training).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信