对于没有康复希望的病人来说,被动安乐死是一种权利吗?

Betül Kara
{"title":"对于没有康复希望的病人来说,被动安乐死是一种权利吗?","authors":"Betül Kara","doi":"10.31567/ssd.927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Euthanasia; It has been a subject that has been discussed from various perspectives, especially in recent years. Euthanasia, which has a wide framework in itself with its meaning, scope, problems and solutions, often appears with its ethical dimension. There is a multifaceted debate on euthanasia in terminally ill patients, irreversible neurology patients, and intensive care patients. In this review, it is aimed to discuss whether passive euthanasia can be considered as a patient's right in the context of the literature in patients with no hope of recovery.","PeriodicalId":353952,"journal":{"name":"SOCIAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA A RIGHT FOR THE PATIENT WITH NO HOPE OF RECOVERY?\",\"authors\":\"Betül Kara\",\"doi\":\"10.31567/ssd.927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Euthanasia; It has been a subject that has been discussed from various perspectives, especially in recent years. Euthanasia, which has a wide framework in itself with its meaning, scope, problems and solutions, often appears with its ethical dimension. There is a multifaceted debate on euthanasia in terminally ill patients, irreversible neurology patients, and intensive care patients. In this review, it is aimed to discuss whether passive euthanasia can be considered as a patient's right in the context of the literature in patients with no hope of recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31567/ssd.927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOCIAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31567/ssd.927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安乐死;这是一个从不同角度讨论的话题,尤其是近年来。安乐死在其意义、范围、问题和解决方案上有着广泛的框架,但它往往伴随着伦理维度出现。对绝症患者、不可逆神经病患者和重症监护患者的安乐死存在多方面的争论。在这篇综述中,旨在讨论在文献的背景下,对于没有康复希望的患者,被动安乐死是否可以被视为一种患者的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA A RIGHT FOR THE PATIENT WITH NO HOPE OF RECOVERY?
Euthanasia; It has been a subject that has been discussed from various perspectives, especially in recent years. Euthanasia, which has a wide framework in itself with its meaning, scope, problems and solutions, often appears with its ethical dimension. There is a multifaceted debate on euthanasia in terminally ill patients, irreversible neurology patients, and intensive care patients. In this review, it is aimed to discuss whether passive euthanasia can be considered as a patient's right in the context of the literature in patients with no hope of recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信