机器学习技术与复杂性理论在外伤性脑损伤患者脑血流动力学中的比较

María Fernanda Lobos Vásquez, Roberth Alcivar-Cevallos, R. Panerai, M. Chacón
{"title":"机器学习技术与复杂性理论在外伤性脑损伤患者脑血流动力学中的比较","authors":"María Fernanda Lobos Vásquez, Roberth Alcivar-Cevallos, R. Panerai, M. Chacón","doi":"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare two paradigms of haemodynamic signals analysis which have been used to characterize between two physiological states. Cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure signals of 30 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 30 healthy subjects were obtained non-invasively. Although different machine learning models have been tested with successful results in many cases of clinical interest, there is emerging evidence that complexity and entropy analysis of biomedical signals can detect underlying changes in physiology which relates to diseases. In many studies, both paradigms have been proved in high accuracy in discriminating between health and disease. In this current work a SVM model and two Complexity-Entropy planes were developed, achieving great power in discriminating health from TBI patients, with an AUC of 0.89 for the machine learning approach, and a highest 0.94 AUC by one of the Complexity-Entropy planes. There are almost no cases that compare these two paradigms, which makes it of great interest to put them side by side and discuss their contributions and particularities.","PeriodicalId":431041,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning techniques versus complexity theory in the cerebral haemodynamics of traumatic brain injury patients\",\"authors\":\"María Fernanda Lobos Vásquez, Roberth Alcivar-Cevallos, R. Panerai, M. Chacón\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to compare two paradigms of haemodynamic signals analysis which have been used to characterize between two physiological states. Cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure signals of 30 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 30 healthy subjects were obtained non-invasively. Although different machine learning models have been tested with successful results in many cases of clinical interest, there is emerging evidence that complexity and entropy analysis of biomedical signals can detect underlying changes in physiology which relates to diseases. In many studies, both paradigms have been proved in high accuracy in discriminating between health and disease. In this current work a SVM model and two Complexity-Entropy planes were developed, achieving great power in discriminating health from TBI patients, with an AUC of 0.89 for the machine learning approach, and a highest 0.94 AUC by one of the Complexity-Entropy planes. There are almost no cases that compare these two paradigms, which makes it of great interest to put them side by side and discuss their contributions and particularities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种范式的血流动力学信号分析已被用来表征两种生理状态之间。对30例外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者和30例正常人进行无创脑血流速度和动脉血压信号采集。尽管不同的机器学习模型已经在许多临床案例中得到了成功的测试结果,但越来越多的证据表明,生物医学信号的复杂性和熵分析可以检测到与疾病相关的生理学的潜在变化。在许多研究中,这两种范式都被证明在区分健康和疾病方面具有很高的准确性。在本研究中,我们开发了一个SVM模型和两个复杂性熵平面,在区分健康和TBI患者方面具有很强的能力,机器学习方法的AUC为0.89,其中一个复杂性熵平面的AUC最高为0.94。几乎没有案例可以比较这两种范式,这使得将它们放在一起并讨论它们的贡献和特殊性变得非常有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning techniques versus complexity theory in the cerebral haemodynamics of traumatic brain injury patients
The objective of this study was to compare two paradigms of haemodynamic signals analysis which have been used to characterize between two physiological states. Cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure signals of 30 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 30 healthy subjects were obtained non-invasively. Although different machine learning models have been tested with successful results in many cases of clinical interest, there is emerging evidence that complexity and entropy analysis of biomedical signals can detect underlying changes in physiology which relates to diseases. In many studies, both paradigms have been proved in high accuracy in discriminating between health and disease. In this current work a SVM model and two Complexity-Entropy planes were developed, achieving great power in discriminating health from TBI patients, with an AUC of 0.89 for the machine learning approach, and a highest 0.94 AUC by one of the Complexity-Entropy planes. There are almost no cases that compare these two paradigms, which makes it of great interest to put them side by side and discuss their contributions and particularities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信