Kamurthi Ravi Teja, Chuan-Ming Liu, Shakti Raj Chopra
{"title":"使用机器学习进行患者健康分析","authors":"Kamurthi Ravi Teja, Chuan-Ming Liu, Shakti Raj Chopra","doi":"10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10100285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this study was to analyze patient health using Machine Learning (ML). To do this, we used the Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost) classifier and auto-ML-Pycaret techniques. The sequential procedure we followed for the XGBoost model is data analysis, feature engineering, and model building, which are discussed in this paper. For these tasks, we used data science tools such as the Jupyter notebook and Google Colab (GC). Subsequently, we discuss the auto-ML-Pycaret model, which is an excellent tool for ML tasks. Finally, a performance comparison is performed between the two models based on their accuracy levels. The accuracy rate for the first ML model was 87%, and for the auto ML Pycaret model, we achieved 88% accuracy. Based on the accuracy percentages and time factor, we observed that the auto-ML Pycaret model performed better than the XGBoost model.","PeriodicalId":441215,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Health Analysis using Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Kamurthi Ravi Teja, Chuan-Ming Liu, Shakti Raj Chopra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10100285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main aim of this study was to analyze patient health using Machine Learning (ML). To do this, we used the Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost) classifier and auto-ML-Pycaret techniques. The sequential procedure we followed for the XGBoost model is data analysis, feature engineering, and model building, which are discussed in this paper. For these tasks, we used data science tools such as the Jupyter notebook and Google Colab (GC). Subsequently, we discuss the auto-ML-Pycaret model, which is an excellent tool for ML tasks. Finally, a performance comparison is performed between the two models based on their accuracy levels. The accuracy rate for the first ML model was 87%, and for the auto ML Pycaret model, we achieved 88% accuracy. Based on the accuracy percentages and time factor, we observed that the auto-ML Pycaret model performed better than the XGBoost model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10100285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10100285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The main aim of this study was to analyze patient health using Machine Learning (ML). To do this, we used the Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost) classifier and auto-ML-Pycaret techniques. The sequential procedure we followed for the XGBoost model is data analysis, feature engineering, and model building, which are discussed in this paper. For these tasks, we used data science tools such as the Jupyter notebook and Google Colab (GC). Subsequently, we discuss the auto-ML-Pycaret model, which is an excellent tool for ML tasks. Finally, a performance comparison is performed between the two models based on their accuracy levels. The accuracy rate for the first ML model was 87%, and for the auto ML Pycaret model, we achieved 88% accuracy. Based on the accuracy percentages and time factor, we observed that the auto-ML Pycaret model performed better than the XGBoost model.